Re: [Sidrops] IXP Route Server question

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 09 March 2022 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596623A0D63; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:39:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iTTIv_jLyqpo; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3338F3A0D61; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1nRzLp-000WLO-Uw; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:39:50 +0000
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:39:49 -0800
Message-ID: <m235jraxm2.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, GMO Crops <grow@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/PDTvf_FaclHuyV-5RfZGqvlsOzo>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] IXP Route Server question
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:39:55 -0000

>> If the underlying question is "should the ASPA path validation
>> algorithm have a corner case that accommodates this?", that is a
>> very, very firm "no" from me!
> 
> aol

opologies, it seems i used an american idiom, and an antique one at
that.  a few folk were brave enough to ask, so ...

tl;dr: precursor of +1

long, and probably somewhat incorrect, answer in the spirit of trying to
keep net cultural history alive.  someone better at net cultural history
than i can probably point you to historical documents.

back in the '80s, there were two large walled gardens of dial-up users,
America Online (AOL) and CompuServe.  when the pressure of the
internet's success started forcing their gates, the first breach was
gateways to the usenet.

aol citizens were over enthusiastic eager beavers known for "meee tooo!"
so the first shorthand for "me too" became "aol."  i am not sure when
"+1" came in, but a decade or so later.  maybe folk had to learn to
count first.

along a similar vein, the precursor to the SWAT attack was having a
truckload of compuserve install cd-roms sent to someone's home.  i am
not sure it was actually done, or was just apocrypha.

randy