Re: [Sidrops] request for call for Working Group adoption draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54913A0553 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAYJ5VGSI9cz for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FD63A0542 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1lcCHR-0007cj-Fg; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:24:57 +0000
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:24:57 -0700
Message-ID: <m24kfox59y.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <YIr9HBXRguacx+VG@snel>
References: <m2pn07gl6g.wl-randy@psg.com> <YEjrr9IKijX1+5We@snel> <m2wnueg9ou.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLaaKZvqj8b8N-N6QUFXJbJVZQ2bzdEbz3sgt6GwugzXKsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaC=x0iqWUcD22Q8Dvcqr8+dCqnun+YDpqLQ7ABiApuOg@mail.gmail.com> <4d20e76a-6765-bc30-6441-b88ccf17e25d@foobar.org> <CAL9jLaaDkk49AA80ZMcHyg_Pq2ZRpE449zmtTCUWSzgPrmWFGw@mail.gmail.com> <m2pmymi3v7.wl-randy@psg.com> <YIfyGerDr5n9Ag2k@snel> <m2fszbel5c.wl-randy@psg.com> <YIr9HBXRguacx+VG@snel>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/RYC1z-381-7JuFVmvbV4drAJr4Y>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] request for call for Working Group adoption draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:25:02 -0000

>>> The 'security community' is most welcome to provide review! Please
>>> invite them. They should be interested!
>> 
>> traditionally, it is the author(s) and the wg chairs who initiate this.
>> i suggest saag for starters; but ykmv
> 
> thank you for this pointer. I'm willing to work to present a case to the
> SAAG experts and invest time to bring non-sidrops experts up to speed on
> what the problem and context is, and then study the implications of the
> proposed solution.

who knows?  maybe they might even have something to teach us.

randy