Re: [Sidrops] Request early IANA code point assignment for draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

IANA just confirmed that 51 will be assigned for prefixlist.

The following entry has been added to the SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1) registry:

51	id-ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-01-29, expires 2025-01-29)	[draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist-01, Section 8]

Russ



> On Jan 29, 2024, at 1:52 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> IANA has made the code point assignment.
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#security-smime-1
> 
>   id-ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
>     { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
>       pkcs-9(9) id-smime(16) id-ct(1) 50 }
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Jan 11, 2024, at 1:46 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Warren:
>> 
>> RFC 7120 provide four conditions for early code point assignment:
>> 
>>   a.  The code points must be from a space designated as "RFC
>>       Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action".  Additionally,
>>       requests for early assignment of code points from a
>>       "Specification Required" registry are allowed if the
>>       specification will be published as an RFC.
>> 
>>   b.  The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
>>       handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
>>       (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
>>       in an Internet-Draft.
>> 
>>   c.  The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
>>       there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
>>       specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>> 
>>   d.  The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that
>>       there is sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC)
>>       implementation and deployment, or that failure to make an early
>>       allocation might lead to contention for the code point in the
>>       field.
>> 
>> draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist meets all of these requirements.
>> 
>>   a.  The registry in question is https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#security-smime-1
>>        The registry allocation rule is  "Specification Required".
>> 
>>   b.  The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
>>        the content-type are in the Internet-Draft.
>> 
>>   c.  Several people want to implement the Internet-Draft.
>> 
>>   d.  The Working Group chairs judge that there is sufficient interest.
>> 
>> As the AD for the SIDRops WG, please request early assignment by IANA.
>> 
>> For the SIDRops WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> 
>