Re: [Sidrops] Preliminary Agenda and SIDR-OPS?

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Wed, 27 February 2019 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478FC1310B4; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:30:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y48wFrEYE7Dc; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:30:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B401310BC; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:30:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8CD83FDE3; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from morrowc-glaptop2.ops-netman.net (unknown [IPv6:2620:15c:3:10:a69f:4935:d470:2a6a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73753304D597D; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.ops-netman.net; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=fail (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:29:56 -0500
Message-ID: <yj9oef7tyti3.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
Cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, sidrops-chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <34DB82B0-CB13-400F-88CA-10F18F2C3EA8@nist.gov>
References: <34DB82B0-CB13-400F-88CA-10F18F2C3EA8@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.1 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/TIOIzFqjow1alABO9iVFPMz9KbQ>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Preliminary Agenda and SIDR-OPS?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:30:01 -0000

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:03:57 -0500,
"Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> While planning for IETF104, I am looking over the preliminary agenda and I am wondering, 
> is SIDR-OPS not meeting this time in Prague?

yes... :( We forgot (I forgot) to make a request for a meeting, I
actuallyhad thought the date to do this was still coming, because I
thought the meeting was in april sometime :( We're in discussion with
the secretariat to see if we can still sneak in, but I'm unsure if
that'll end successfully.

-chris