Re: [Sidrops] About the use of manifests (follow-up from Apr Interim meeting)

[Christopher Morrow <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:06 PM Stephen Kent
<stkent=[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Chris,
> > did you mean 'angel hair pasta' ? :) (which I agree, far better than
> > that gross fat worm pasta... but...)
> yes, angel hair, unless I was thinking about elbow macaroni, with sharp
> angles

:)

> > i think this was the meat of the previous discussion:
> >    "originally we left a lot of wiggle room, because <reasons>"
> agreed.
> > and today/now:
> >    "uhm, leaving this much wiggle room was ... oops! folk would REALLY
> > like to understand
> >     the tradeoffs in a succinct manner (that does not require phd in
> > pkix) and some better
> >     guidelines on what they should set as default behavior that
> > can/will set a base security/safety
> >     level for their deployment."
> >
> > which I think is the goal of job's draft? I understood from previous
> > email conversations on
> > the WG list that the previous author set was happy to suggest
> > improvements but had no time/$$
> > for the full edit job?
>
> I will offer edited text for section 6 later today.

cool! are you planning on running this to ground fully? or sending
along the text and having another person manage the update stream/etc?