IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] 6486 bis

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 06 July 2020 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7033A09D3 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZymSM4O4QAY for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F32A3A09D1 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jsWvN-0005P6-Jq; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:37:09 +0000
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:37:09 -0700
Message-ID: <m24kqke8pm.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Cc: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaZL24qW9A-2jjKj7je+ME_mSzZRGxmzMWpcnfCoJ9C=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0365f842-ff05-b252-2fc7-f6f408fc52e3.ref@verizon.net> <0365f842-ff05-b252-2fc7-f6f408fc52e3@verizon.net> <20200701150648.GI85729@bench.sobornost.net> <a37c45f4-4cd0-7119-38d5-c5877b32de6b@verizon.net> <06204A5D-2DE1-49AC-A3DC-4B825E3880D0@ripe.net> <3d9aff9c-7f0c-ce47-efaf-6014080ece4d@verizon.net> <CAKr6gn1jVq6FVTaGKtmEWNzWT0CTbZ=zducfGuxt11MwmBNNvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaaZL24qW9A-2jjKj7je+ME_mSzZRGxmzMWpcnfCoJ9C=A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/VrYFmaqY2i7K4IV0aMqlV3TJknI>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] 6486 bis
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:37:14 -0000

>> This is the model adopted by APNIC as well, since the inception of
>> the service.
> clarifying question:
>   "apnic's implementation only uses one-time.."
> yes?

i would be  surprised to learn of a CA which multi-used

but, if you want to learn about strange differences, much more
interesting to ask about validity periods of mft, crl, ...

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email