Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-01.txt

Job Snijders <> Wed, 10 March 2021 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F643A201B for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuo7tprtBLHM for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 162213A1D59 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id c10so37193598ejx.9 for <>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZRfAoZbMdQxmgd9zHMfSbeUvz3WEzZ/rLEW02WnQfEo=; b=OQnwPysPmcWGpyrxXoM4uLQUo98d1Qwvg4rhOziwq6mMNJCfOK8ZQpIDU/baZ5lFvJ BFYaqQuPUo3dIf7YcBKKg58+hhhPgczDEsbMb/wNBnrtBumJ6n7xDlESGHeeu7djWwar XLp3sP984yUlbJnvlVfrqZdd05GFBBNG7ppdo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZRfAoZbMdQxmgd9zHMfSbeUvz3WEzZ/rLEW02WnQfEo=; b=R8dMmwJtwNrkEd7qSJwBvwuodyUuVwyn8lOHbIiwuvE01Kv5recK79BBycv6PI5Fmo HlBY0pXlXBBROypRbLTvuA4Qx5VLFFEQzoKfB6XDS3jY0JxJ3Hs9F31KpNgIhHmqZ5Z0 nTzz5shKlDx52gkAbam52tl16m/qyaMGu4yGxk0XXkiJu6eRBr7hh8fnm8ewPT5hP01l EinNfs+zGP6AEivfaQMKb3R6irZsRg0Ny1YwRatJdW0nV9BeCLaUhB7+niNqBCLPxf6s fV/uB/UBsJ4TK8yxWN/DGp5hw1AcDTdgdvm5YQYTSULU63DFd15cm8cb7bCNDnjmTNHw krxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xEDrlY73vly9GF2Wuqj8i2Si4ZkmJ2owM68KUZ0/5KkV4H6ge bP9S2IniTK2D6Tv6RfkiMw6sHWvrHGCeaHf/aOGnkL0fomJFv8UnhIWd+6JnCQLbU5+sPRJFf3J eJlZe4VLpDfPHVP40L5+pPsu2bWRqnuPV9nHTpfdFtjTuKaQ9Os3C0kQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFg4zlAyYmbE9lGOclI+d0e9bcSiIHG5eH1MBJSjRWxRtN1kGeBDogGznJFEXmGbLxzBqx1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e119:: with SMTP id gj25mr2623030ejb.509.1615368337180; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snel ([2a10:3781:276:0:21e:c2ff:fefb:f388]) by with ESMTPSA id e18sm9370896eji.111.2021. (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:25:35 +0100
From: Job Snijders <>
Message-ID: <YEiQj3EsCA7rvBTC@snel>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-01.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:25:41 -0000

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:12:29PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
>  Signed Checklists are expected to facilitate inter-domain business
>  authentication, inter-domain interconnection provisioning, and
>  use-cases which depend on an ability to verify resource holdership.
>  resource holdership verification processes.  RPKI-based validation
>  processes are expected to become the industry norm for automated
>  Bring Your Own IP (BYOIP) on-boarding or establishment of physical
>  interconnection between Autonomous Systems.
> worked examples of these use cases would be good

Update for the working group:

In addition to an ASN.1 formal notation, the description of the CMS data
structure in a natural language, and two running code, Randy further
highers the barrier by requesting a 'worked example' is also included in
the draft.

Naturally, I immediately got down to work and wrote a 'worked example'
[1], which I shared privately with Randy. Unfortunately this text was
rejected as being unintelligible. Alternative text was not provided.
Thus this worked example will not be included in the draft as it does
not appear to increase readability of the RSC draft.

The trouble with 'worked examples' is that they merely a literary device
and not the real thing.

Kind regards,