Re: [Sidrops] [WG ADOPTION] draft-va-sidrops-deploy-reconsidered-01 - ENDS 08/11/2019 (Aug 11)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 15 September 2019 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BCB1200C5 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxXYs7IO1qIL for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB54120116 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1i9YWj-0007I7-GD; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:41:33 +0000
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:41:32 -0700
Message-ID: <m2tv9dwj77.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Stephen Kent <stkent=40verizon.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, sidrops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6062D822-A075-43DC-B7E0-841F824BDF80@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <yj9o7e8bjdaj.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net> <aed96e4a-0ba3-20e3-7412-c7d62cd6d193@foobar.org> <1d35c5cd-7303-3ac5-49c8-87f478a61a4e@verizon.net> <2f64752b-40df-892a-5c31-d460f147c264@foobar.org> <6062D822-A075-43DC-B7E0-841F824BDF80@nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/XDKXQEGOsrzMyDRijntbKKEuQ6M>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [WG ADOPTION] draft-va-sidrops-deploy-reconsidered-01 - ENDS 08/11/2019 (Aug 11)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:41:43 -0000

> I think the real tragedy here is not the use of the term "Certificate
> Authority"

i strongly agree.  imiho, this whole validation reconsidered path is of
no brnefit and, through complexity, offers opportunity for harm.  this
document tries to sugar coat a vile pill.

randy