IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] erratum

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Wed, 08 November 2023 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jsnijders@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E70C1516EB for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:46:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ydoJ54mQFZY for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com (mail-oo1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D49D6C15C28B for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:46:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5872c6529e1so100057eaf.0 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:46:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1699479979; x=1700084779; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c+mt+5mCpR0MUbYkHRCLrXQIG9ePeTpAqCorwYKL6HQ=; b=gAvEglQd7Y+xX/+B2g+nPYR4lI+A3/1zhtmIoAPkRj3+G/mL40Wr6Y8zDU8jThXFQY BF36OcDbT6kiZIfy+waO4fhQUJIDx1yaBGuplU+klwgLXXXgNtXsBR/bGrk+wou82bv/ km5C2vR192HD30NZzDFqokxap9pX8L7SlqyG0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699479979; x=1700084779; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=c+mt+5mCpR0MUbYkHRCLrXQIG9ePeTpAqCorwYKL6HQ=; b=LgFpj5M8eDjgGxLcwbJN+XNMiN4zDkxfHhAIDNoZwJfC8CZbB7+ONgIweDoUhoKZpn qylz+vXrrIw3EPOfhuDr3XBNx8oHZ9DoWlMtvUZjY2wMD4dEi8A3IPXR3RWywOwSNV7T jU5NL7t8ZylTwQ8EfLgC2u3UtOvE9+AyGDcwdA2ZVsyOiskQ5YO6Sdz7zlqHHGfnFM3z N+yObmV/LbawMUGz9J5l9KYOIB+iitC/mxtpCHINdjEODoe4dSRkf8CPKGWLJjSUoOFx cXRewzf7/4km0XA5hN8afQ2iK26yaYGa38YjAUB3KLtC+9URqjv9P01Wqa3bB4A2epeZ wfXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzD1hO/6l8ohp4R7YuPZg0ZGNh6Uq6bUuDQemS1XDjo92leyPgz ZiFmwrR9KyP1u7S2C9JVPqHgNxAu+DgEMqUT1KGbBw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF9oIGNG8LLLWZA6YtuMtt5uoUZDpCH86E+yBSb0hUATqB0intSq3p5gdFLY3HLs/JlaJoJrW1RkNg6pOeYXyM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:138:b0:573:4da2:4427 with SMTP id i24-20020a056820013800b005734da24427mr3258302ood.7.1699479979049; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:46:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m2sf5ggcfu.wl-randy@psg.com> <ZUv_e1xfKT9FG-e-@shrubbery.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZUv_e1xfKT9FG-e-@shrubbery.net>
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 22:46:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMFGGcD13y_0J8hrwr8aU7=vCkmTn3xg_MpsNHJ5TvoixVmVGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007460220609ab04de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/XbHQ-tFisywAmWrabtnTkV31CgI>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] erratum
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 21:46:56 -0000

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:37, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 01:30:45PM -0800, Randy Bush:
> > a friend may have caught an erratum
> >
> > rfc7115
> >
> >    Operators should be conservative in use of max length in ROAs.  For
> >    example, if a prefix will have only a few sub-prefixes announced,
> >    multiple ROAs for the specific announcements should be used as
> >    opposed to one ROA with a long max length.
> >
> > should that last "long" be a "short?"
>
> long seems correct to me.



yes, long seems appropriate to me

32 is “longer” than 24

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status