Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> Thu, 24 February 2022 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF2B3A13A1 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:53:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKRqfaBY_EEp for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.126.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219313A1341 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED5E383; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:53:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net []) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1645707226; bh=QB9mdI1Sbpjv+Wc40Z2cRsuEZctjs5ACTwtwczCjGNw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=vhE+NX9MsIrP+b2NjXnu3VLZSYBOU9ONyE+jb6VCfE4Jt9MQZGz5QJUAVFlC6jCek NTxhA+I2ct7Byfzc/gXdjuWudLxexy8G8EhBFSF1r182AY2hR13N6ynQWaOdV/XY3h Nrku0pWNiFYKhqhrsYiLXE9HF5jnr7eTVJ0ob9r8w/hOVg1NZkNoLXc3XzE3CUIChZ pjuTaxvzCe0SnTZ4xuTF3GQ8IuwB5vUPFAjSNFxoMvI5zsl3zfsNL/v6c6AJNZ9rOE 77aix7BA2xRFT7o9MHGbNXcmgH3fzCikU885I+gtzylCIC1elnA5iRQrdZEFudQ+DF BBJ3A/ua6Xt5g==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <C29AFF81-9E65-4EE7-996B-F5E63970C46F@massar.ch>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:53:42 +0100
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <70EEDAD8-D94B-401C-ABF3-8C6520E38123@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <015C9C28-4230-40D8-A9F2-7420B726C00F@juicybun.cn> <DF148DA2-C94D-42BF-A37F-668D9B37860B@nlnetlabs.nl> <YhS/WR3czIP3jNLF@snel> <ABE3FA29-6C9D-492B-A72A-68C20176E76D@nlnetlabs.nl> <949277FD-27AF-40E8-B557-AA58C62BFEA7@apnic.net> <E16290C1-77ED-4CB1-8712-F6163304ED45@nlnetlabs.nl> <m2k0dmmntj.wl-randy@psg.com> <6D314C7A-8CEC-4B9B-8F80-6B1AC48037E2@nlnetlabs.nl> <85D947F4-E2A4-4FFE-86AF-2D129C49FB9C@psg.com> <8413F0CA-F50A-42B7-B0DA-19A0A90ABE6F@nlnetlabs.nl> <YhdCYjS+yDVsFgNF@snel> <60B6D863-047D-40A6-80DD-95C05391A0BA@nlnetlabs.nl> <CAMFGGcBhm7bGbAL7CRdmHYJVsOtRGRaPD56Tvi=xSW=+Y=n8Rw@mail.gmail.com> <5AAF971A-CD2C-4D27-B5CB-CE370A7D6E40@nlnetlabs.nl> <C29AFF81-9E65-4EE7-996B-F5E63970C46F@massar.ch>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/Yx0xR6CJ1RCvzt2MM_dFGPzXWZw>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:53:59 -0000

Dear Jeroen

> On 24 Feb 2022, at 13:34, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> wrote:
> 
> Dear Tim,
> 
>> On 20220224, at 13:12, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> [..]
>> With regards to "looking for help".. not the most respectful way
>> of phrasing it.. but let's move on..
> 
> Is such a sentence needed?

Is it nice if someone's character is framed a "looking for help"?

Did you not just say: "...instead of attacking eachother between lines"?

Well I noticed the attack and I mentioned that I am letting it pass.
I even proposed to clear things up in person .. in the bit you did
not quote that is.

Tim