IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] proposed, revised text for Section 6

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 05 May 2020 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6AB3A13B9 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 21:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5A6BfHuoETQ for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 21:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2595E3A13B2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 21:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jVpGU-00076R-Oo; Tue, 05 May 2020 04:33:06 +0000
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 21:33:06 -0700
Message-ID: <m2lfm7ngql.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn29namLq5qq6WhhveT+6r7vC8W9SmwPcNP_un93GWmP9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <557f0928-c7b1-4b8d-b3b6-078733f7ef8a.ref@verizon.net> <557f0928-c7b1-4b8d-b3b6-078733f7ef8a@verizon.net> <CAKr6gn29namLq5qq6WhhveT+6r7vC8W9SmwPcNP_un93GWmP9A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/eG-3ORcbWlPck7yK4X_GTWKPjlg>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] proposed, revised text for Section 6
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 04:33:55 -0000

> I just want to note that while I think you made a logically consistent
> choice, I do not agree with its intent, in as much as I believe cached
> state could be used to construct the valid state which the manifest
> and CRL declare.
> 
> So, I think you drove to a harder place than I intended. But, I accept
> this is a choice, and a strong choice.
> 
> I suspect I am in a minority of one on this. I would not seek to
> impede a group decision driving to a more narrow constrained
> definition.

sra has bludgeoned me much closer to your position

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email