Re: [Sidrops] WG Adoption call for draft-borchert-sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling-01 (9/16-9/30)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 16 September 2019 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B31200B5 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FnUZZ7lt1Txt for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0667120041 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1i9yXc-00039Y-5K; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:28:12 +0000
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:11 -0700
Message-ID: <m27e68ue1g.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>
Cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <m28sqouepr.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <0BBFA8C1-A13D-4CC9-A72D-ABAE797F2E4F@arrcus.com> <m28sqouepr.wl-randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/eMrA17yaAZs69Yt085KMrEhjsCA>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG Adoption call for draft-borchert-sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling-01 (9/16-9/30)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:28:15 -0000

> "This document defines a new BGP non-transitive extended community to
> carry the BGPsec path validation state inside an autonomous system."
> 
> given the one in RFC 8097, we need a new one because?

i have the same issue with draft-ietf-sidrops-validating-bgp-speaker-03

can we settle for one community?  though i am not particularly enamoured
with the extended one in 8097, at least we have it.

randy