Re: [Sidrops] RPKI Signed Checklists - draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-rsc-01

Job Snijders <> Thu, 11 February 2021 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07B23A0F2E for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xbKLBryfCMs for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6667F3A0F22 for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id l17so2076502wmq.2 for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3gZSsWHQQACArbr+u/Nh3MnE10o+JfZSd8PY11guhe0=; b=Ccw7fkP1PaYZ1dwYD/ci0LBUBrhjw5w0MGAevZprpYhlkRcO6c5t/B5zz2TCi5+YgV Zwfq+YwMlhNeHNLvshPHqfZV4HF+wTWazrwZDeyQE7sRKkrbAJtgvJS/krAVx3kwC4e1 /N+1LitAfh3Q/Xwnfv9SYTR370v3yc1/KeGps=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3gZSsWHQQACArbr+u/Nh3MnE10o+JfZSd8PY11guhe0=; b=uXuu1+9PLw1/buzyHBudgITgmJJMNZitRcHVT/h4u+vk8U+Fu7DTfgVDp5Wup7P80V ho7dw/hiBmkfQ2GSey23PVfYZ9kIpjkkjPptOK7vmsAsaDakbxWKWVs1KYLQREE+B9lW 8xblXmU2EOlV78aOTljr8yqtMzmnlpenOOmUFTGA9uH+9kq2yrSwJgDAZaV5cZQVGdZY PbU5flb7XEEaRQtA9GbHh85wI6nzrHiOf34u4JEFxrC3vTX6Fo66/AjbU3g2WAATg0hB OptB5nzyeMwIud+aRtFCDolEyb2g6D1erCnmLnOOvS9jQlLFafqftX+MJVitPPFNgcrM dC+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KI8qnwjytAlO5KHxOEGT6LzLk9O7g+L5ADW6MMl4SXCSjbGnJ GxixNxIHU8JtrPMV8SNB1YpVBiBjbg7vj2zRfA3JoYGBjAF/TsJdepcQMtlKHDCVaba7PQQYHet ok9Norheh9Q9XqEp6FPrdAVZM9Do+/6iZj7geKEPacNvJEE1WEJwFMqE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9cmulxZxp6ee975pFhNHsujSyANN/sWwXTPtmR0OFZzfiC2MQR9IrDP9YyOGKrGxnuhIr1A==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f70c:: with SMTP id v12mr2304684wmh.77.1613010995527; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snel ( []) by with ESMTPSA id w11sm6023565wmi.37.2021. (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:36:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:36:33 +0100
From: Job Snijders <>
Message-ID: <YCSYMbqOMGhyNVyX@snel>
References: <YBwv0jryMQ9KL9OO@snel> <YB3BhRECFDAGnxts@snel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PZzwAvamYJ6I2yXm"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YB3BhRECFDAGnxts@snel>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] RPKI Signed Checklists - draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-rsc-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:36:40 -0000

Dear group,

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:07:01PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> I.... hopefully managed to generate the world's first RPKI Signed
> Checklist! It is possible this RSC was generated incorrectly, I don't
> have a proper validator yet. Generating this RSC .sig involved an ASN.1
> to C to XML to DER conversion process, the Lament Configuration, and vi.
> Attached to this email are 3 files:
>     432K Feb  5 21:31 b42_ipv6_loa.png             \_ arbitrary files
>     212B Feb  5 21:31 b42_service_definition.json  /
>     1.6K Feb  5 21:31 checklist.sig                <!-- the RSC!
> The 'b42_ipv6_loa.png' and 'b42_service_definition.json' files are part
> of an imaginary private business to business process in which I try to
> prove to a service provider I'm authorized to use 2001:67c:208c::/48.

Alas... the February 5th 'checklist.sig' file was not correctly

Tom Harrison from APNIC was so kind to point out two errors:

* The X509 v3 CRLDP extension was missing from the embedded EE
  certificate. RFC 65487 Section 4.8.6 mandates the presence of this
* The "IPAddress" BIT STRING in the "ResourceBlock" was malformed.

For testing purposes a newly generated 'checklist.sig' (rectifying the
above issues) has been attached to this message. Again the temp OID is

Thank you for the feedback!

Kind regards,