Re: [Sidrops] AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers

Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn> Tue, 12 February 2019 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <madi@zdns.cn>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7F9129619 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:31:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oI23XMkjHET2 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:31:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpproxy21.qq.com (smtpbg297.qq.com [184.105.67.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35F7127AC2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:31:15 -0800 (PST)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp22t1549938669te9ymmb4
Received: from [192.168.3.18] (unknown [118.247.10.155]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:31:07 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000000000M0ZI70B00A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: jLTfbrzLdoNJ46PrrgWafhTmMgk8yxYZzmtz7WmLAo/ck3z8WeuEMt93Df4OK shHDEYb+mdtwvJrpeODIZui6TTp2eh2lVwuai+Z1Fc5u4uj0NJAI8BN5+bjl30nV60kTnc9 iZPW3ElcvnlV55Zx+OB8uhheyLvVHOQsSQRq11T/h/4I1keBaUzqfTBYzVa2gGwlhJFZA51 lOwgYDG1teVxVbH34PRDRCK1NSL3ETbHGCIhYnVf4CZxA3Xus2yVEegHwZJCrbrawK8CBcx f5bTahJqgT4Ev1Co6g0RAbFYih/xCYkKTWS4kQSbk5j265cSoGSUJWUUA=
X-QQ-GoodBg: 1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn>
In-Reply-To: <67E36A7E-7778-4D43-9EF2-D5EF00A7337A@tislabs.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:31:06 +0800
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4579DE6-B7AD-419E-A930-A827A525C1CE@zdns.cn>
References: <23649.35961.352370.101277@oz.mt.att.com> <B07A1487-7AC1-4F48-9D0C-C032E2780DFF@tislabs.com> <19FC2A7A-574C-467D-A0B7-079CAEF595FC@zdns.cn> <67E36A7E-7778-4D43-9EF2-D5EF00A7337A@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:zdns.cn:qybgforeign:qybgforeign1
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/f5dVc6H5w_ZTDaFWqPSeXbrdppY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:31:22 -0000

Sandy,


> 在 2019年2月12日,02:50,Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> 写道:
> 
> Hm.
> 
> Well, Jay is a/the top engineer at AT&T and a very long time visible AT&T presence at NANOG, so when he says "is now dropping” I tend to accept that as truth.
> 
> I gather you are looking for some corporate press release, from maybe a CIO/CTO/CEO/C-something?  Something suitable for convincing some other CIO/CTO/CEO/C-something of the corporate stance behind the statement?  I don’t know, I have not looked for one.
> 


Yes.  It would be lovely that I can reference some corporate press release to share with China Internet Community, to let them know RPKI-based OV is making progress worldwide especially in big ISPs such as AT&T. 

Di


> —Sandy
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:46 AM, Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn> wrote:
>> 
>> Sandy,
>> 
>> Thanks for sharing. 
>> 
>> Glad to know another ISP to let the RPKI take effect.
>> 
>> Is there an official statement from AT&T on this for reference? 
>> 
>> Di
>> 
>>> 在 2019年2月12日,00:34,Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> 写道:
>>> 
>>> Great news for RPKI deployment.
>>> 
>>> One response asked for AT&T to share more about the experience.
>>> 
>>> Between this and the Cloudflare announcement some months back, someday the world might get to the point that there could be a current practice document for deployment, initial or steady state.
>>> 
>>> —Sandy
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
>>>> Subject: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers
>>>> Date: February 11, 2019 at 9:53:45 AM EST
>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>>> Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> FYI:
>>>> 
>>>> The AT&T/as7018 network is now dropping all RPKI-invalid route
>>>> announcements that we receive from our peers.  
>>>> 
>>>> We continue to accept invalid route announcements from our customers,
>>>> at least for now.  We are communicating with our customers whose
>>>> invalid announcements we are propagating, informing them that these
>>>> routes will be accepted by fewer and fewer networks over time.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks to those of you who are publishing ROAs in the RPKI.  We would
>>>> also like to encourage other networks to join us in taking this step
>>>> to improve the quality of routing information in the Internet.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> 						Jay B.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sidrops mailing list
>>> Sidrops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops