[Sidrops] Re: [WGLC] draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin-00 - Ends 1/July/2024

[Claudio Jeker <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Ties de Kock wrote:
> > Hi Job,
> > 
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 05:52, Job Snijders
> > <job=[e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:31:41AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > > I'm happy to remove section 2 in its entirety if it is causing you
> > > > heartburn.
> > > >
> > > > The goal of this draft proposal is just to impose new requirements
> > > > (section 3.1 and 3.2). For me it is a non-goal to explain how RRDP
> > > > works or how to implement it sanely beyond SOP, all the rest is what
> > > > RFC 8182 is supposed to do.
> > >
> > > To illustrate what the above suggestion would look like, I've attached
> > > an rfcdiff, txt, and html file. At first glance this seems an
> > > improvement to me.
> > 
> > For me the document is clearer and more concise with these changes.
> 
> I agree. I like this version better.

I re-read this version, agree this is better and support publication of
it.

-- 
:wq Claudio