Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for production (Was: Reason for Outage report)
Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 27 August 2020 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518E03A12DA for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64-mUjWZQH3S for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [185.49.140.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5B43A12C1 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.localdomain (217-122-250-127.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [217.122.250.127]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEE5A1ABFE for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:39:28 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=benno@NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1598560769; bh=3GcR6jZcvIE/lGoA1LFYUCjUGaf37mLezidv/zEgEDU=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VGniWxuZjWdeZx6YSYq5C7MEy0RT99z3gyDOt8k1B5maje6ZbzJqTT3RcCmwbeSk9 18dvOB3YE8JGU1EMCYpM9H42pmlbYjZDc/B+TbFNjr6Th9w0W2dQE/yUh4DbJIziqq Rj3obiC/OHAiNkNkxuW6Sqe+/HNdq800qz+CJ+qA=
To: sidrops@ietf.org
References: <DE33EFAE-FBD2-478F-92A9-1FBD81CCC43F@arin.net> <727F6FBD-F73C-4F58-AE2D-0276B2A183A3@arin.net> <20200826160001.GF95612@bench.sobornost.net> <20200826202442.232829fc@grisu.home.partim.org> <20200827142827.GC88356@bench.sobornost.net>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <c0b5b25d-44e7-c205-22c0-ff1392445589@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:39:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200827142827.GC88356@bench.sobornost.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/fFVAhhiQp_p5AIsSuV4tl-9U6kw>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for production (Was: Reason for Outage report)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:39:32 -0000
On 27/08/2020 16:28, Job Snijders wrote: > The only ones arguing against the consensus are RIPE NCC and NLNetLabs > employees. Go figure. Staff and knowledge were exchanged between the two > software houses, a path is visible how the misconceptions continued to > proliferate. It is not too late to change course, but catch-up is > needed. Please stick to technical arguments in the discussion on the mailing list, and omit insinuations and false extrapolations. Thank you. -- Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
- [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: ARIN… John Curran
- [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 August 20… John Curran
- Re: [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 Augus… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 Augus… John Curran
- Re: [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 Augus… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 Augus… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] ARIN RPKI Service Impact - 12 Augus… John Curran
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … John Curran
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report Mikael Abrahamsson
- [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for production… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Reason for Outage report (was: Re: … Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Lukas Tribus
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Nathalie Trenaman
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Sidrops] weak validation is unfit for produc… Tim Bruijnzeels