Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)

Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> Thu, 28 February 2019 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192A5131204 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:43:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFG1_buE7ZKH for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9551311FF for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1gz9mv-003GtV-1N>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:43:01 +0100
Received: from x4db7b587.dyn.telefonica.de ([77.183.181.135] helo=mw-x1.fritz.box) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1gz9mu-000jmF-QN>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:43:00 +0100
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:42:58 +0100
From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
To: "Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)" <dougm@nist.gov>
cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <0B6FBEFD-DF57-4613-9B66-ED4A9E8302A2@nist.gov>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1902280134560.11872@mw-x1>
References: <m2fts968ei.wl-randy@psg.com> <BD686FC4-58B7-48FC-85EC-EEC5C2F30B53@vigilsec.com> <20190227215142.GB21642@pfrc.org> <3EF81391-A613-4F10-B636-E29ABB5643DA@vigilsec.com> <7735E727-E19E-493B-ACAE-38F6A1A4BA75@nist.gov> <m2ef7s4wtx.wl-randy@psg.com> <0B6FBEFD-DF57-4613-9B66-ED4A9E8302A2@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)
X-X-Sender: waehl@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Originating-IP: 77.183.181.135
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/ffgNZlDrS-MxKker8_Gwwz3ziAI>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:43:12 -0000

The main problem of this discussion is the past: Sidr(ops) has history 
on discussing this topic (sorry that I'm too lazy to give reference to 
the mailing list pointers).

Personally, I have the impression that we run in circles. I don't see a 
clear and crisp reflection on what has been discussed that gives 
striking conclusion on continuing this topic.


Cheers
  matthias


On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Montgomery, Douglas (Fed) wrote:

> Which of your N hundred routers will you login to, to do the "show bgp rpki servers"?
> 
> We thought the one sending you "unverified" state would be a good clue.
> 
> No one was asking for the cross product of any other info ... so I don't really buy the slippery slope logic.
> 
> I hope you are right about everyone rushing to join the parade.  
> 
> I still see as many folks express concerns about debugging as wave flags.
> 
> dougm
> 


-- 
Matthias Waehlisch
.  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Computer Science
.. http://www.cs.fu-berlin.de/~waehl