Re: [Sidrops] 6486 bis

Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org> Wed, 17 June 2020 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jayb@oz.mt.att.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE3F3A09D8 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qzPgLaiiSrQM for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hrabosky.cbbtier3.att.net (braeburn.org [12.0.1.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9F3A09D9 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 04:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oz.mt.att.com (zoe.cbbtier3.att.net [12.0.1.45]) by hrabosky.cbbtier3.att.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D5E48611 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:44:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oz.mt.att.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58F615640E67; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:44:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: emacs 25.2.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I); VM 8.2.0b under 25.2.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <24298.552.280109.125463@oz.mt.att.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:44:40 -0400
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
To: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>
Cc: <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200617105537.36e9ee17@grisu.home.partim.org>
References: <0365f842-ff05-b252-2fc7-f6f408fc52e3.ref@verizon.net> <0365f842-ff05-b252-2fc7-f6f408fc52e3@verizon.net> <20200617105537.36e9ee17@grisu.home.partim.org>
Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: DDDB 542E D988 94D0 82D3 D198 7DED 6648 2308 D3C0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/i2Il7eA3VbKGlT7cH74Ji3Dfgkw>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] 6486 bis
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:44:50 -0000

Martin Hoffmann writes:
 > 
 > I am curious what the plan forward is with regards to 6486-bis? 

Hi Martin,

In addition to Job's comments, don't forget about the upcoming SIDROPS
Interim meeting, merely one week from today, which was specifically
called to discuss "some of the pending changes to RFC6486 which were
discussed at the last event."

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/z9JmkXqDuvd31fLTtVzkQDT1-WI/

Hope to see you there!

						Jay B.