From randy@psg.com Mon Mar 4 11:33:51 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6008FC14CE2E for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:33:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.106 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=psg.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nC1ioMod0nEw for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:33:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5EBC151522 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:33:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=psg.com; s=rgnet-mail; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc: To:From:Message-ID:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=x2iQH5LGjqjzMxZOT5GZeWyETU5cfExmVBHlwI/DZLA=; b=JzfkE0S9YrpqPK82eCAkwykTCz PVMrN5LlPMN85wrKVeQL49dZdHRXuG7Ob8vmIQoAwhAcYaA0n41uyFAjGhV5Tbuz+IQUUD3s3Rqxk ScglLC+4vlqF6VSnghePb4rsTK4pBIcB2E+wz4eq35GAXRhk2S48txvzSngObJvO9NOQm5YgGb7tZ JZSBHU6Nt1LHu0wlkQPScPQbmyYggBnPtku/bfGhS4pW0zWMFksn8nxXAHNIerJc04YQ1hvVyfDQk SVYN9H5ijMCOFWrBR1OUAYsy+ILWBO9eVI1F/IOH/rAdU4IKJdFoNvhmGD+M0UKFqmsCcXq082s87 OGRvFciQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1rhE4H-0003bN-Iz; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:33:45 +0000 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:33:44 -0800 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Job Snijders Cc: Claudio Jeker , sidrops In-Reply-To: References: <43e9a8461d05470190ee7d3a7bb46cf4@huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sidrops] version negotiation X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 19:33:51 -0000 > This sentence reads slightly awkard, feels like a loose end: > "A session is not [re-]established, but data learned need not be deleted." > perhaps: > "A session is not yet [re-]established, any previously learned data > need not be flushed for the time remaining in the Expire Interval." thanks how about A session is not [re-]established, but data previously learned need not be flushed. no need to complicate by draging in expiry. randy