IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] rfc8210bis further review - question 2

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Mon, 18 March 2024 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B931FC157938 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dm_pGA_LPjWP for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x36.google.com (mail-oa1-x36.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08868C151993 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x36.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-221ce6cac3aso2846794fac.2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1710801864; x=1711406664; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z7mtSBNiNn8kAsIXAUKjzAcXC6PXgs4i5HrlidsptlM=; b=Dm4Mg3W5iqQVRrmw21CPZIMHv+l0Hd4yiv3wFSDNGwkuvnORSfbiicEqtz/zI/vC6l SbScbSjPvIY/HJVK7Gice62BMnw2Ikn8nt0OAKunYeSClGJlr7a6sruhZ2F8gOULFpuu jdLoyZX3ILKuHQ8LC2Zrh1PZ7fTHKiucN/VdQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710801864; x=1711406664; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=z7mtSBNiNn8kAsIXAUKjzAcXC6PXgs4i5HrlidsptlM=; b=U1WELZE9jjhQOD7PzgzB5vKEetrK+wmqB3PVD1pq829+ZsEOCkBZDCyZv4eEMMkx7z MBaaXPg39L1X485GaWqkX9+rvge2KHXlan+suRzoZ4cpshNXRsZ65oQB9u0WcufAyyA0 RV/YUfsrZL7gQ9soEDBvGv2pTWgU6mWTBfhcLzWiWzIUxqSXDnUEk/A3Y26EofecCOUv ROz01/YM3E1JF1WxQLQMSYZbI0QmQvXm6WGEGbWyw5DV60SLoPms2mIIT6YmUxOBvhN2 fOZLCAfUivboz0abBmMNLAXAwHfGuGRMV24M/iv+0ayu2wC9iZqeKSYOSKWrpru82zAQ o2Ww==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU7q/RhWMU7oqXLrvT4mxaoy3qTXbnkO8VWTgOrV/KaQkbDFJMa/XSmLuP0W0ObihWb/dePMk26XlBgH6FMqQ5X
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxWyTSJwoU/3b3fw5+SknWPfeL5SIrUi6lMRKq9rCOuXGUT34n ONgIzJX4WXZUyTVcEEHXyTg7xZDBtu0M9bxnrdHcYEETkprFgU1n4PFq4TrkIUAokHg3rRkQ1c6 YCFc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4yFVeoF0T4+/nk0RtSTGsDZjeICJd9jk3N9ovjnaNHQ9it6Y88PjZlY6YspxK86cPhzGOCQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4611:b0:221:9157:b587 with SMTP id z17-20020a056870461100b002219157b587mr1090457oao.35.1710801864096; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from feather.sobornost.net (dhcp-930b.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.147.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ks1-20020a056a004b8100b006e6cc458206sm8634923pfb.175.2024.03.18.15.44.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:44:18 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZfjDwnLIPMBoCsor@feather.sobornost.net>
References: <ZexJxZYsgNGth_Q7@snel> <ZexN0VtykWRlmGvq@snel> <PH0PR09MB118394019CAD6F5E1436B3A7C98292@PH0PR09MB11839.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <ZfP651xK3ejKjnJU@feather.sobornost.net> <PH0PR09MB11839392EBF58C9401601A745982D2@PH0PR09MB11839.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <m2cyrri5jb.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2cyrri5jb.wl-randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/lcEodz4l5nKPbiuRYQVdOn12H9E>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] rfc8210bis further review - question 2
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:44:28 -0000

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:39:04PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > My main point was that RTR server implementers need not (SHOULD NOT?)
> > generate just a single Session ID, but for robustness, generate a
> > Session ID per protocol version.
> 
> as changing protocol verions requires starting a new session, and the
> session id is bound to the session, this seems moot.

Are you sure that being this terse is the best you can do for future
implementers?

Kind regards,

Job

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status