Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

["Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <[e-mail]>]

I will try to upload 05 today,

Oliver

On 4/11/19, 6:42 PM, "Sidrops on behalf of Adam Roach" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

    Thanks! These two changes look good to me. I'll clear when a new version 
    of the draft is submitted (note, however, that I am out of the office 
    tomorrow).
    
    /a
    
    On 4/11/19 4:33 PM, Borchert, Oliver (Fed) wrote:
    > Adam,
    >
    > I also addressed ...
    >
    > §7:
    >
    >>   To be modified to:
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > And changed it to
    >
    > +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > | 0x02-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    > +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Oliver
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 5:32 PM
    > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
    > Cc: [e-mail]; Chris Morrow <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
    > Subject: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
    > Importance: High
    >
    > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
    > draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: Discuss
    >
    > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
    >
    >
    > Please refer to https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534300243&amp;sdata=cat0%2BcdMYXrnoT7a%2F0frYtwlzUIW0SoG8LWq%2FkYhexA%3D&amp;reserved=0
    > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    >
    >
    > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    > https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534300243&amp;sdata=jKTlKC0lTq%2BBKAzvKfvEBxsFshcVsP0eBgYOZPjBKcI%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > DISCUSS:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Thanks to everyone who worked on this document.
    >
    > This issue should be trivial to fix, but it's still a blocker.
    >
    > §2.1:
    >
    >>      Special-Use algorithm IDs span from 0xFA (250) to 0xFE (254).
    > §7:
    >
    >>   In addition IANA is asked to register the following address space for
    >>   "Special-Use":
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0xFB-0xFE  | Special-Use   | Special-Use  | This Document         |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >
    > The ranges here do not match ([0xFA-0xFE] != [0xFB-0xFE]). Presuming that the text in Section 2.1 is what was intended, this issue impacts all of the tables in section 7.
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > COMMENT:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > I agree with Alexey's discuss.
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > §7:
    >
    >>   To be modified to:
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > Nit: The prose has been updated to use "0x02" rather than "0x2". It would be nice if the IANA section matched this update.
    >
    >
    
    _______________________________________________
    Sidrops mailing list
    [e-mail]
    https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsidrops&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534310248&amp;sdata=PKhnvr013zQO4aMtlHTP54u7%2FOScRVQzzgfZu0xjh6g%3D&amp;reserved=0