Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov> Fri, 12 April 2019 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F8A1201DA; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nist.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lNu4zED_JlM; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GCC01-DM2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr840135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.84.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A43512037F; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nist.gov; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1xfY8B79MXrCM7k+pd0kmHNpyF8tBppR7nWGN/aUOvQ=; b=qYmbeQTsCGW75QDPafSnrndMxHa0QBdFxL4USFKbTSvL0JaAZnff/21fWgQgNSDc/kSe2ZG+LFj9bDppwP6zTJj3QPxybvamuIGLlUIebUgAaKT40P7wdmlHEX05T4M5z18VXfRFPe1FflaS08gXsQRakLwnxhNyR1ke1hkcX10=
Received: from BYAPR09MB3159.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.178.0.209) by BYAPR09MB3160.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.178.0.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1792.19; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:24:17 +0000
Received: from BYAPR09MB3159.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7572:a62c:ed7d:db9a]) by BYAPR09MB3159.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7572:a62c:ed7d:db9a%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.018; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:24:17 +0000
From: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidrops-chairs@ietf.org" <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU7+TomgBeH2NnAEacVxYvcq6yZqY3fD7AgAATkQCAALNngA==
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:24:17 +0000
Message-ID: <9B0EBE95-B2FE-4F3C-9CED-CB48D2F6F3C7@nist.gov>
References: <155493194558.22757.15388423154564497249.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN6PR09MB3167E2F652CF94E50958427E982F0@SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <b7492915-8b7f-f575-b9f5-373d838a78a7@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <b7492915-8b7f-f575-b9f5-373d838a78a7@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.1.190326
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=oliver.borchert@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [2610:20:6222:140:e9c7:e6fe:43e9:fb79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9d76ee26-b099-4fc6-7a0c-08d6bf4a2a5a
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR09MB3160;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR09MB3160:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR09MB3160A9C978BDB667534AD5C398280@BYAPR09MB3160.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0005B05917
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(376002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(54164003)(25786009)(8936002)(99286004)(6436002)(6116002)(68736007)(86362001)(36756003)(46003)(105586002)(106356001)(486006)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(316002)(256004)(54906003)(76176011)(58126008)(110136005)(14444005)(478600001)(97736004)(6246003)(229853002)(2616005)(83716004)(71190400001)(6512007)(45080400002)(6306002)(53936002)(82746002)(6486002)(14454004)(186003)(476003)(966005)(71200400001)(5660300002)(2906002)(446003)(4326008)(7736002)(33656002)(53546011)(6506007)(102836004)(11346002)(305945005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR09MB3160; H:BYAPR09MB3159.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: IGZvqmHn/4rYkOAVTrjxgKM57Bsx259co96Z+IAef7CYkRTe6X5ohbh5o4DAjMa+S70uT1wcezkswGEPztSve3yWeA4jre80zCCDqaTbvfUC0C0DJjOBlc3nFyOATeE++W4m8lYA2o/tMoCbqbhdChjvdqN9+zo3eaNjLeE0CilhPzthPrV3LX8TZwMRxoV/uSWMAnYZE+p2i03sDf0XXg5Idribg9N1xfCOwj8f5oJXDwmfT1kNbE8rre246za0sQbVE/6YXoB3/cUgu8w8Q3SByo3uEHt8giGsrjeO2+LkdNJMX0Fbq6he5mr4nsQqQXi+pzmheKorl79Wg3OYaBHzP59BBd5E1mBhit5Wn62pilaJVES6z4xQypEbXA/AwTfLmanPPevQDzpsSm0ktsxXckSq6mwbjpPKrvgkNXI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FE469ACA0C21614493D72E208974B13F@namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9d76ee26-b099-4fc6-7a0c-08d6bf4a2a5a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Apr 2019 13:24:17.6269 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR09MB3160
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/lh6LjQMzhpGjs4IdGPWK-6ZKRTo>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:24:32 -0000

I will try to upload 05 today,

Oliver

On 4/11/19, 6:42 PM, "Sidrops on behalf of Adam Roach" <sidrops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Thanks! These two changes look good to me. I'll clear when a new version 
    of the draft is submitted (note, however, that I am out of the office 
    tomorrow).
    
    /a
    
    On 4/11/19 4:33 PM, Borchert, Oliver (Fed) wrote:
    > Adam,
    >
    > I also addressed ...
    >
    > §7:
    >
    >>   To be modified to:
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > And changed it to
    >
    > +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > | 0x02-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    > +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Oliver
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 5:32 PM
    > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
    > Cc: draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org; Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>et>; sidrops-chairs@ietf.org; morrowc@ops-netman.net; sidrops@ietf.org
    > Subject: Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
    > Importance: High
    >
    > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
    > draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: Discuss
    >
    > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
    >
    >
    > Please refer to https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534300243&amp;sdata=cat0%2BcdMYXrnoT7a%2F0frYtwlzUIW0SoG8LWq%2FkYhexA%3D&amp;reserved=0
    > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    >
    >
    > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    > https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534300243&amp;sdata=jKTlKC0lTq%2BBKAzvKfvEBxsFshcVsP0eBgYOZPjBKcI%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > DISCUSS:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Thanks to everyone who worked on this document.
    >
    > This issue should be trivial to fix, but it's still a blocker.
    >
    > §2.1:
    >
    >>      Special-Use algorithm IDs span from 0xFA (250) to 0xFE (254).
    > §7:
    >
    >>   In addition IANA is asked to register the following address space for
    >>   "Special-Use":
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0xFB-0xFE  | Special-Use   | Special-Use  | This Document         |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >
    > The ranges here do not match ([0xFA-0xFE] != [0xFB-0xFE]). Presuming that the text in Section 2.1 is what was intended, this issue impacts all of the tables in section 7.
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > COMMENT:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > I agree with Alexey's discuss.
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > §7:
    >
    >>   To be modified to:
    >>
    >>     Algorithm   Digest          Signature       Specification
    >>     Suite       Algorithm       Algorithm       Pointer
    >>     Identifier
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    >>   | 0x2-0xFA   | Unassigned    | Unassigned   |                       |
    >>   +------------+---------------+--------------+-----------------------+
    > Nit: The prose has been updated to use "0x02" rather than "0x2". It would be nice if the IANA section matched this update.
    >
    >
    
    _______________________________________________
    Sidrops mailing list
    Sidrops@ietf.org
    https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsidrops&amp;data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C6b3f894c581742ec6be408d6becefbe2%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636906193534310248&amp;sdata=PKhnvr013zQO4aMtlHTP54u7%2FOScRVQzzgfZu0xjh6g%3D&amp;reserved=0