IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-07.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 19 May 2022 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DE9C16550E; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FV6Hh__Bv9h; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2592C15EB43; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1nrmyp-0004nc-31; Thu, 19 May 2022 20:42:43 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:42:42 -0700
Message-ID: <m2o7ztfe4d.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa>, Job Snijders <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BDB58DF-0431-4676-9606-611C129A4B0B@vigilsec.com>
References: <165298105049.28270.14685971986743868185@ietfa.amsl.com> <YoZ/bsYUeHpCW3Mc@snel> <D55CE24C-36E2-4976-84BB-BDB19E0E2CC2@vigilsec.com> <DB9P190MB10839201BF38E8D1BCD485BBC0D09@DB9P190MB1083.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3BDB58DF-0431-4676-9606-611C129A4B0B@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/ltMoedZoR16vuEsxbX4pIxPBPFA>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-07.txt
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:42:50 -0000

russ:

> Sorry that I was not clear.  Since the goal is to align with RFC 3779,
> we should use the same definition as was used there, which is OCTET
> STRING (SIZE (2..3)).

this makes more sense to me, as i do not see a win in having rules that
apply on wednesdays and fridays and not on other days of the week.  one
wants to be able to write tools that are not complicated unnecesarily.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email