IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> Thu, 24 February 2022 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jeroen@massar.ch>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE01C3A1221 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=massar.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQ-2AcTDAoPS for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from citadel.ch.unfix.org (citadel.ch.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:1620:20b0::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69313A0C2F for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a10:fc42:a:1042:ca2a:14ff:fe1f:2b7b] (unknown [IPv6:2a10:fc42:a:1042:ca2a:14ff:fe1f:2b7b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen@massar.ch) by citadel.ch.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49DD222B056B8; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:34:28 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=massar.ch; s=DKIM2009; t=1645706068; bh=qr1r/819ue6BiRJVjjPAqxyMZau3jTjwq6T8yhD8w0Y=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=L8OBsZMqK19TT7llDNrgy9W313r/qTqTyieuYrlbgIbkguLdvmA5OMFTq5YBrCf+Q tWROn0HnfdtULzsutCC614Ap+4MH7FAoRp4TZffNhSAhpIqqvxo6M3aS0+uE8EM2jN ysANMTh8wxX8przDAD/bjMU2w6z45kyj105jV+7Sh4vhXBdNXDest7H5YFLXt9o4BK /NQ1iUZi60BV82/4JCeXggA2cW4M7JLiIcM6TjdaDTk07U1z5odRin0KqK7BHCCwU7 HEx8IGtdXTZS028FaoFh6avVD6B/qp0YaGqnuWClvh/oZDyTTnWGeGQDoYndiZ5lAM FZtyYzKrgTqeg==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5AAF971A-CD2C-4D27-B5CB-CE370A7D6E40@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:34:27 +0100
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C29AFF81-9E65-4EE7-996B-F5E63970C46F@massar.ch>
References: <015C9C28-4230-40D8-A9F2-7420B726C00F@juicybun.cn> <DF148DA2-C94D-42BF-A37F-668D9B37860B@nlnetlabs.nl> <YhS/WR3czIP3jNLF@snel> <ABE3FA29-6C9D-492B-A72A-68C20176E76D@nlnetlabs.nl> <949277FD-27AF-40E8-B557-AA58C62BFEA7@apnic.net> <E16290C1-77ED-4CB1-8712-F6163304ED45@nlnetlabs.nl> <m2k0dmmntj.wl-randy@psg.com> <6D314C7A-8CEC-4B9B-8F80-6B1AC48037E2@nlnetlabs.nl> <85D947F4-E2A4-4FFE-86AF-2D129C49FB9C@psg.com> <8413F0CA-F50A-42B7-B0DA-19A0A90ABE6F@nlnetlabs.nl> <YhdCYjS+yDVsFgNF@snel> <60B6D863-047D-40A6-80DD-95C05391A0BA@nlnetlabs.nl> <CAMFGGcBhm7bGbAL7CRdmHYJVsOtRGRaPD56Tvi=xSW=+Y=n8Rw@mail.gmail.com> <5AAF971A-CD2C-4D27-B5CB-CE370A7D6E40@nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/mPPP-fGTSpLonQdFfeo6F4su4Kc>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [routing-wg] misconceptions about ROV
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:34:39 -0000

Dear Tim,

> On 20220224, at 13:12, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
[..]
> With regards to "looking for help".. not the most respectful way
> of phrasing it.. but let's move on..

Is such a sentence needed?

Greets,
 Jeroen

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email