[Sidrops] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-02: (with COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"Therefore it SHOULD be possible to specify an origin validation
   policy which MUST BE run after such non-deterministic policies."

The normative language here doesn't quite make sense. "MUST BE" is not a
normative keyword and the construction "SHOULD ... which MUST" is a little
confusing. I would suggest something like:

An origin validation policy that is required to be run after such
non-deterministic policies SHOULD be specified.