Re: [Sidrops] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01
Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Tue, 01 March 2022 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB133A1988
for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:56:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Z1nJczNTIHJL for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83193A1989
for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TestYJ-PC (unknown [218.241.103.136])
by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0AJEXm10R1isCMlAA--.2204S2;
Tue, 01 Mar 2022 15:56:37 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:56:37 +0800
From: "Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com>,
"SIDR Operations WG" <sidrops@ietf.org>
Cc: gggeng <gggeng@jnu.edu.cn>, =?utf-8?B?UmFuZHnCoEJ1c2g=?= <randy@psg.com>,
yanzhiwei <yanzhiwei@cnnic.cn>
References: <03FBC58E-8227-4007-8962-6DCC7F4F2C33@vigilsec.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.20.273[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2022030115553677092368@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_001_NextPart872421341706_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0AJEXm10R1isCMlAA--.2204S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Kw1UCryxWrW7KFWrXrW5ZFb_yoW8Gw1fpw
s5WFnxGF1ktr42gas7Aw1UAFyIy395Jay7JF13J3y7Ca4Fgr10qryUKwn8ZryUJ343WFW0
qr4UWws8J3y7uaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2
9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBlb7Iv0xC_Zr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2
0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw
A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII
jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I
8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF0I0E
4I0vr24l5I8CrVC2j2CEjI02ccxYII8I67AEr4CY67k08wAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJV
WUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAK
I48JM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F24lc2xSY4AK67AK6r4xMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMx
C20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAF
wI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20x
vE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v2
0xvaj40_WFyUJVCq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14
v26r1j6r4UMVCEFcxC0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8vfO7UUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/nLrcq8ZQA8Jn50_971GeQgODyRs>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>,
<mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>,
<mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 07:56:47 -0000
Dear Russ, Thanks a lot for your kind review and great comments. We co-authors will follow your comments and update them to the new version. Thanks. Jiankang Yao From: Russ Housley Date: 2022-03-01 01:53 To: SIDR Operations WG Subject: [Sidrops] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01 I have a few comments on the document. Section 1: I find the first paragraph very confusing. The use of "must" sent me down the wrong path. I think the first sentence should tell the reader that we are talking about the RPKI. Then, it should explain the choices facing the address space holder. Then, say that the document will explore the pros and cons for the various choices. Then, recommend the most desirable among the alternatives. Section 1: s/space[RFC6482].If/space [RFC6482]. If/ Section 2: Please use the modern language here: The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. Section 3: s/Ripencc/RIPENCC/ After reading to document, I ask the authors to consider dropping "Problem Statement" from the title. Russ _______________________________________________ Sidrops mailing list Sidrops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
- [Sidrops] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-01 Russ Housley
- Re: [Sidrops] draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-consideratio… Jiankang Yao