Re: [Sidrops] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-6486bis-09: (with COMMENT)

[Job Snijders <[e-mail]>]

Dear Zaheduzzaman Sarker,

Thank you for the review.

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:04:21AM -0800, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for the efforts on this specification. It was a good read.
> 
> After reading the shepherd's writeup I was expecting an update to 6486 but the
> document actually obsoletes 6486. Something happened between when the shepherd
> writeup was written and when this doc went for publication, not captured. Not a
> big deal I guess, would have been better to get this captured.

You are right that something happened: after shepherd write-up during
IETF Last-Call the observation was made that the document should
obsolete 6486 as it is a complete replacement. See the emails
before/after this message https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/_Ys3mNuBs4AIDEi7aT4CkRj94ic/
for more context about the change.

> Nits:
> 
>    Section 4.2.1 : "The issuer MUST ensure that the value of this field is more
>    recent any previously-generated Manifest", missing "than" ?

This nit was addressed through
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/EYxcUtZLF7go2UBnOoOXqwn6bRY/

Kind regards,

Job