Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73F4130E71 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:55:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ngrO6DKt_wt for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F71D1200B3 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1gzOyE-00021b-W8; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:55:43 +0000
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:55:42 -0800
Message-ID: <m2va133l9t.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)" <dougm@nist.gov>
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <0319BBE5-1991-4513-8E20-7AD72E991074@nist.gov>
References: <m2fts968ei.wl-randy@psg.com> <BD686FC4-58B7-48FC-85EC-EEC5C2F30B53@vigilsec.com> <20190227215142.GB21642@pfrc.org> <3EF81391-A613-4F10-B636-E29ABB5643DA@vigilsec.com> <7735E727-E19E-493B-ACAE-38F6A1A4BA75@nist.gov> <m2ef7s4wtx.wl-randy@psg.com> <0B6FBEFD-DF57-4613-9B66-ED4A9E8302A2@nist.gov> <m27edk4llm.wl-randy@psg.com> <0319BBE5-1991-4513-8E20-7AD72E991074@nist.gov>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/ovomi4JfuNMjv0WWMHrHFZj_VhY>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG-ADOPTION: draft-borchert-sidrops-rpki-state-unverified-01 - ENDS: 2019-03-12 (mar 12)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:55:48 -0000

> Are you saying no one uses the RFC8097 extended community in iBGP?

not to my knowledge.  see rfc 8481

i am proposing to use that extended community, or something analogous in
draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-signal-02.txt.  but finer granularity of NotFound
is not desired there either.

> Certainly it is noteworthy when an author objects to his own spec in
> LC ... although it can be a confusing signal.

i have done it twice.  friends begged me to sign it; so i did.  did not
mean i liked it.

randy