IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Thu, 26 September 2019 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD0E120232; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Px6cpfUj_vSM; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3D11201C6; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3015:3606:cbe1:646d:de6:ead6:233] (unknown [IPv6:2603:3015:3606:cbe1:646d:de6:ead6:233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4238C5401DC; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:46 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <D49ED265-0C25-4FE0-BB02-4F176DA4BE5E@puck.nether.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:45 -0400
Cc: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, IDR <idr@ietf.org>, GROW WG <grow@ietf.org>, idr-chairs@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <69F03192-CE2E-4126-910D-A7E3B3AA8848@puck.nether.net>
References: <DM6PR09MB3019D019788E916525EDC3DC84D40@DM6PR09MB3019.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <01c201d54d3c$74375ee0$5ca61ca0$@ndzh.com> <D49ED265-0C25-4FE0-BB02-4F176DA4BE5E@puck.nether.net>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/r5x2tuhCxFUEgutdDr8p1t0Cc7k>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:16:51 -0000

(Obviously my search in e-mail today went afoul, I see it’s adopted.. but like I said.. there’s a lot more AS_SETs that appeared in BGP announcements since this was posted).

- Jared

> On Sep 25, 2019, at 8:13 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> 
> (I didn’t see any follow-up) but I suspect the intent was adoption.
> 
> I did notice after this a few more BGP announcements with AS_SET occurring on a very regular basis.  I suspect someone is doing some research on it, perhaps someone reading this e-mail :-)
> 
> - Jared
> 
>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:23 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sriram: 
>> 
>> Are you asking for WG Adoption of this draft at this time or just feedback?
>> 
>> 
>> Sue 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: GROW [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sriram, Kotikalapudi
>> (Fed)
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 11:43 AM
>> To: IDR; GROW WG
>> Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org; sidrops@ietf.org
>> Subject: [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback
>> requested
>> 
>> There was significant interest expressed during a SIDROPS presentation in
>> Montreal and in the discussion that followed at the mike about advancing the
>> following individual draft:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumari-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-14  
>> (standards track)   
>> 
>> The authors have revised and uploaded a new version (-14).
>> Your inputs/comments are welcome. In particular, please share any specific
>> operational considerations/concerns you may have regarding this topic.
>> 
>> (Note: A BCP was published on this topics in 2011 --
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6472 )   
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Sriram
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> GROW@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> GROW@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email