Re: [Sidrops] draft-sidrops-maxlen - questions from 110 session

[Alexander Azimov <[e-mail]>]

Ben,

Thank you for this comprehensive analysis. What makes me anxious is the
absence of ROV filtering at least at the subset of T1 actors. For example,
from my BMP monitor, I see hundreds of Invalid routes coming from Level3,
both v4, and v6. This makes the attack scenario in the US region on an ISP
connected to, for example, NTT quite straightforward.

To summarize my attitude to this document - min roa practice can be useful
for a subset of networks (where it is applicable) at the level of the high
rate of ROV filtering adoption by transit players of the selected region.
It's hard to say if this can be easily evaluated and though be a general
suggestion for the community.

пт, 12 мар. 2021 г. в 00:05, Ben Maddison <benm=
[e-mail]>:

> On 03/11, Ben Maddison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > 65010 and 65020 perform ROV and drop Invalids on import
> > 65020 and 65021 do not.
> >
> s/^65020/65011/
>
> Thanks for reading carefully Randy!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
>


-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Azimov