Re: [Sidrops] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)

"Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov> Mon, 15 April 2019 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982AC120192; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nist.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7k0ZnydTWUn; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GCC01-DM2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr840108.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.84.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04104120230; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nist.gov; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=r/nMZ/6ZVwd7i1dXsmAMJBTrWt3uf9esWv0HINPwhNA=; b=k8NH8Zqs+7pCKncpwb+6dL++IRZ7hadlSypr3fa3SdyFutVOZVvH4aVbfkzQp2nZKjsHRnfeae9JuywqpmtCF4iNq7D1NHqlbNlj4KLAOQQ2Cu5TJhI8WS4ru+wuTzoXMrrX1S0y7AkVU/3VXGzBaiUIpYRJabULZSF5z7O8rCc=
Received: from SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.177.250.204) by SN6PR09MB3165.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (20.177.250.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1792.19; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:39 +0000
Received: from SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::694c:8a72:b9a7:5832]) by SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::694c:8a72:b9a7:5832%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.018; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:39 +0000
From: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
CC: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, SIDROps Chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis@ietf.org>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Sidrops] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHU78WVwxYQIWvxVk6QM4XyxdXWDaY1vIuAgAAsaQCAAAC6AIAA0aWAgAAfQgCABqpDgA==
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:39 +0000
Message-ID: <0D7B26FA-D7E5-41EE-B0FD-0C634F12BB5E@nist.gov>
References: <155491848705.8904.6102999785203393745.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iKkxDiB4G1HQbgkDsJN8DpOomwCh1EomAh_co_25KpWEw@mail.gmail.com> <7433410F-E7A3-47B8-87F1-C170C30CE4E5@sn3rd.com> <20190410213026.GH18549@kduck.mit.edu> <554dd3b6-4e1b-4582-8411-cf98425b1d21@www.fastmail.com> <D9D741A1-B2AD-4482-AB52-408BCE8CE3AE@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9D741A1-B2AD-4482-AB52-408BCE8CE3AE@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.1.190326
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=oliver.borchert@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [2610:20:6222:140:a838:e6cd:25f6:27f0]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5a369ed0-7d4b-4218-85b2-08d6c1eadcf5
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600140)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR09MB3165;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR09MB3165:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR09MB31658F20B96A22AC7D15076D982B0@SN6PR09MB3165.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 000800954F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(7736002)(256004)(14444005)(71200400001)(97736004)(5660300002)(6486002)(106356001)(6512007)(8936002)(105586002)(99286004)(6436002)(33656002)(6116002)(229853002)(82746002)(86362001)(36756003)(93886005)(54906003)(68736007)(110136005)(102836004)(305945005)(46003)(11346002)(83716004)(446003)(476003)(316002)(58126008)(2616005)(71190400001)(2906002)(4326008)(81156014)(478600001)(486006)(14454004)(81166006)(53936002)(6246003)(8676002)(76176011)(53546011)(186003)(25786009)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR09MB3165; H:SN6PR09MB3167.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 4zn8kz0kIruLjAfl7ucd9cy3b4TGYT9bE+IyuHkv8OD/42oECsJi7ef+xSodKw/s5wU8upVctURWPnbvnpqfevXV4QSzFvrSFuKLQH+QPDcWR89qJlXVs7OxHN7KV/gDPE1QF4FfVPPvUOFvpgd4oupXmGkQfFNwmyytUtDKnkMbr2MscpMrNNKDDGWDZMKiXvz5qvP43+NqAY8KGSuD+WPn/23aMb6YU8fXD6ysP2Tr3jD0t7ArgYHPt0ilPujbLViRpfzJbBJNR2CxTpi1xR/Un5RX+cl4EvjhxLIxHI5D2zrsVtE5Cqb3dCKqv7U191+c6WG4Tz0NCksELvGm1tedoyVJNboGSRkK7Sqyi1DCv/NhIqfHRASODQAPS8yxKRhfCmhthrzJFMva2IcgIwGHEmIu/XHi+L9gmn68Hfc=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4DA846B8A3D5364B9C2629E8942B6DAC@namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5a369ed0-7d4b-4218-85b2-08d6c1eadcf5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Apr 2019 21:39:39.1739 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR09MB3165
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/x5oTry_bf-TnSYF44pq4wFdcVXk>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-04: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:45 -0000

From IESG evaluation record:
> Alvaro Retana Yes
> Comment (2019-04-11)
> I support Alexey's DISCUSS: this document should be marked as Obsoleting rfc8208.

I modified the draft to "Obsoletes" and uploaded draft-ietf-sidrops-bgpsec-algs-rfc8208-bis-05 with the latest changes.

Oliver


On 4/11/19, 7:52 AM, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

    
    
    > On Apr 11, 2019, at 06:00, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:
    > 
    > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, at 10:30 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
    >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 05:27:50PM -0400, Sean Turner wrote:
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>>> On Apr 10, 2019, at 14:48, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
    >>>> 
    >>>> 
    >>>> 
    >>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:48 PM Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>> DISCUSS:
    >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>> 
    >>>> This is a fine document and sorry for nit-picking, but why is this document
    >>>> "Updates: 8208" instead of "Obsolete: 8208"?
    >>>> 
    >>>> 
    >>>> Thanks an excellent question -- I suspect that the answer is simply "Whoops, that was a mistake" -- is that correct?
    >>>> W
    >>> 
    >>> Nope this draft is an updates because it’s just adding some things to 8208 not replacing it entirely.
    >> 
    >> Er, what is left in 8208 that's not being replaced?
    >> The diff seems pretty indicative that all the content is present in the new
    >> doc, to me.
    > 
    > Exactly. This document doesn't just update the IANA registration process, it incorporates the whole RFC 8208 content. After it is published as an RFC, there would never be any need for people to read RFC 8208. This means it is obsolete relationship.
    
    No argument whatsoever from me about whether this is an obsoletes/updates.  am looking forward to the finalized IESG statement on updates vs obsoletes ;).
    
    spt