Re: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-6486bis-09: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 03 February 2022 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC43A0860; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEilyASV5Pv3; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x935.google.com (mail-ua1-x935.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::935]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DAFE3A085D; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 07:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x935.google.com with SMTP id n15so5781929uaq.5; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:19:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hcKX8IE1h4vsEWM8v7g2GSMksiXRor37sc6lu1irzVY=; b=ZexzKfqMJp0p6Amc6VaW/NmL2TYaf77LLnzL00XtMa/ER4VAm4vON1XxyoD8hltbXC SIuq7B5C7OXa//PguLw7//6gsgi47AXnmBWbrZ28S98vek+vLNpJ2hvg9fPS1gNO7Dfk Tij0jmDabmU45FNa5ku8Zn05kz3J8ckvs3zqX1WXzfjB1rkxuWfYoNhz7rnwCaCRtcdI +GaipJ6oAoC4F9ZSo4fnNLDMwGHg5nfVXKNRuDf8fRlk3g5QwiH8hksdax7zUr7JhhE+ bEk5M3nyX9HKn7Z81EQPTQGHeZ43VxZxkWCdRplRHc8k7X7Z8YfmgrG3W263Z+qNYFzG nbfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hcKX8IE1h4vsEWM8v7g2GSMksiXRor37sc6lu1irzVY=; b=cdnZPkUYOb+i2sbbnUffzk6tGUldtEjpcQvUiz9hkBEr8UlZItZf/cn795ZExJQc96 cKJD1g7srSWI6GACXXTO782Kz6vp6/KD72U+sboNgOeulv1UEBZkI90kM+3whpnYMCFl Jn2Hqa0ugsJioiivZy/2ls4vUg+A12Yfir+X5nCKylGPLVC+QmrJ0mmyuGjKN2e3OwPz A03sJVpWi4fiNugmZcPnOmbHPvuyT+EvllHgpNv7VJ16fg5RIUnZB8tT7N2CmOQOD3Ry j6KHzf3l2YEpfuN2sJQVt0cytXd/Z+R+Pisfr3svJuBCFBXNM3+XwN9oXLZLNIsDGC77 TfiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Q84Bn6z/N6M+bXZhLKKi0AytzKLlRcJmUgKrxxzaRFIC1+d7z Jal6dgWPup+4BgDNYLSoNghMmM5bKGcNIM4RyJ8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDLJfPRy6CZayOyGjYZode9f2NR8wlpuEJo14KBaOUDMPROs/TeNtfmFSNtCN3IH7DFMyfcCZK8IqBzyhZUoU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:919:: with SMTP id x25mr13484720vsh.18.1643901595736; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:19:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164378415609.9683.10141540796531135717@ietfa.amsl.com> <YfvvVX8VDZFx9Mpu@snel>
In-Reply-To: <YfvvVX8VDZFx9Mpu@snel>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:19:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY6_QiK1dWRfdN82JJxF82QrEaY16jaAm9kPGS4OREhAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sidrops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidrops-6486bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a8e46b05d71eaa0d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/zWtqpxSY7mRX6cW6uJfm4bOYOOY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 10:15:25 -0800
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-6486bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 15:20:03 -0000

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:06 AM Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> wrote:

> > The response to question 7 of the shepherd writeup doesn't really answer
> the
> > question being asked.
>
> I searched through the archives and found this 2011 message:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/qIH6oAeWpeHzYmE783oK-rKi6ck/
>
>     "No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D."
>

Right, but question 7 asks whether the authors have affirmed they know of
no IPR claims that still need to be filed.  The IESG last call includes a
declaration that none have been filed, but that answers a slightly
different question.


> In the interest of progressing this document it seems prudent to obtain
> stronger assurances that the -bis document does not introduce new IPR
> concerns.
>
> Through the sidrops@ietf.org mailing list I'll publicly request whether
> the
> authors know of any IPR related to this document, once all four responded
> I'll
> circle back to this thread to tidy up that aspect. Stay tuned.
>

Good stuff, thank you!

-MSK