IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80A112041B; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CiycaWkFt6Dr; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA95120417; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:322d:baab:2d25:5a1f:c51c:c29b] ([IPv6:2607:fb90:322d:baab:2d25:5a1f:c51c:c29b]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x3OKvVqa024389; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:57:33 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <m25zrarhxy.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:57:31 -0700
Cc: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6344FA11-A853-474A-BF2C-F884ABE9637E@bogus.com>
References: <155562409732.25526.1571500373372550686@ietfa.amsl.com> <m25zrarhxy.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/zyWYDZ_Q8682n8oZ5rj91LnHPaA>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:57:36 -0000

 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 18, 2019, at 16:51, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> thanks stewart; review appreciated
> 
>> 6.  Security Considerations
>> 
>>   Though the above use cases are all constrained to local contexts,
>>   they violate the model of a single global PKI, albeit to meet real 
>>   operational needs.  Hence they MUST be implemented to assure the
>>   local constraint.
>> 
>> SB> I can see why RFC2119 language is used, and it seems correct to use it,
>> however Nits is complaining that there is no RFC2119 boilerplate.
> 
> <doh>  will fix
> 
>>   [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview]
>>              Lepinski, M. and S. Turner, "An Overview of BGPSEC",
>>              draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview-02 (work in progress), May
>>              2012.
>> 
>> SB> Nits asks if you mean this version or -08?
> 
> the ref is from pre ww2.  it's an rfc now.  will fix.
> 
> thanks again
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email