Re: [sieve] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate-01.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3365721F95DB for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.610, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.219, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwUAM4gQVs1d for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [62.3.217.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8982F21F946B for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1365068359; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=JaDIBDQ5rYNh+U5rEuoOgEKNnJ+C2+cNyMXo6x886As=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=SM6TQ2k1r5xq0D5gJpk8l8Z3fnw/i3OoxgsbpVbeCvhf6RFtBeqG+d57WZSTaz0m1NWwNt tygRMNdXg6QPShOkoRRXYaLZex8aFa87TRQeXe/U+EaE4PMyvn6II4SC68WNp2a3ylk4C3 WhBcYBrZmiB1U+xz7211n9k76kRBvNA=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <UV1KRgA4j3AZ@statler.isode.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:39:19 +0100
Message-ID: <515B1F8E.5010202@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:12:30 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: Stephan Bosch <stephan@rename-it.nl>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <20130210000420.4778.87812.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5116E5ED.20307@rename-it.nl> <513B1839.3050202@rename-it.nl> <01ORB1SUSLYS000054@mauve.mrochek.com> <514AF7A9.3040502@rename-it.nl>
In-Reply-To: <514AF7A9.3040502@rename-it.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sieve mailing list <sieve@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sieve] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:39:21 -0000

On 21/03/2013 12:06, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Hi Ned,
>
> Op 3/15/2013 6:39 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
  [...]
>> (2) I'm wondering if it wouldn't be best to suggest a default timeout.
>>    12 hours? A day?
> It can be useful. Anyone else got suggestions or comments about this?
I have no objection to something like 1 day, but why do we want to make 
it different from "vacation", which uses 7 days, if I am not mistaken. 
(I don't have strong preference in favour of 7 days.)