Re: I-D ACTION:draft-daboo-sieve-include-03.txt (fwd)

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Nigel Swinson wrote:

>>Thinking some more, Kjetil's one-liner about variable scope in the
>>variables draft makes perfect sense in the context of there being only one
>>file in a script. It is the include draft that adds more files, and more
>>potential scopes, and so in the include draft this should be explained and
>>accounted for.
>>
>>I withdraw my complaint about the scope detail in the variables draft :-)
>>    
>>
>
>I am also totally happy with this too.  :o)
>
>It's slightly unfortunate that the term "global variable" in the variables draft may end up meaning "file scope" in the context of variables+include, but I agree that it's not a major issue, and it's not worth holding up the variables draft for.
>  
>
I think we all agree what the term "global variable" means in the 
variables draft.
But if people feel that the term "global variable" might be confusing, 
we can still replace it with something else as an editorial change.