Return-Path: <owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B686F3A68C0
 for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>;
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:13:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
 by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9tyzCXCXGEb8
 for <ietfarch-sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@core3.amsl.com>;
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com
 (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2])
 by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542753A6857
 for <sieve-archive-Aet6aiqu@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C26B28076718
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:06:11 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
 by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n0C26BQU076717;
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:06:11 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to
 owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from ladle.sendmail.com (ladle.sendmail.com [209.246.26.53])
 by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0C260Uk076707
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:06:10 -0700 (MST)
 (envelope-from guenther+mtafilters@sendmail.com)
Received: from fife.sendmail.com (fife.sendmail.com [209.246.26.50])
 by ladle.sendmail.com (Switch-3.3.1/Sentrion-3.0.0) with ESMTP id
 n0C28rII014989
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:08:53 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sendmail.com;
 s=ladle.dkim; t=1231726133; bh=QNLpUvl6f9UE3W94WMQaSxUzPM7fIoSoJVrO
 BouyqOU=; h=Received:X-DKIM:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:X-X-Sender:To:
 cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:User-Agent:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-MM-Ex-RefId; b=CgBxYZBXzH/BAVsxACAGH1a
 m7XrEcPxTe9ulznDjyWN0tBS7Jnkx3MQzH/g0HMs8vATWUQTOMrBqY2uPHL0oRP3ZLV
 u05i9vI9S48A6kIWJHFIv3LWC/c+YzvCjGaP/U4dsVtLH2ST+ZLUfxoJMsU8W/vxYOm
 Jfsfiw3Fnh4ljQ=
Received: from [10.210.202.20] ([10.210.202.20]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by fife.sendmail.com (Switch-3.3.3mp/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id
 n0C25wtq019738
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:05:58 -0800
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.6 fife.sendmail.com n0C25wtq019738
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sendmail.com;
 s=fife.dkim; t=1231725959; bh=QNLpUvl6f9UE3W94WMQaSxUzPM7fIoSoJVrOB
 ouyqOU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:
 References:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=H2GkE0qRie6/jxL+L7BHQ7gXOf
 NDqEAO36Xt6OZvcAFqhGlagX8eFt0KFRtwCDLcujgzQ3xDbPFq5pv7DRb1T1Zz37pBQ
 UwdU3dQXdB1eAfH1rSBei39Nbt6wDY64tOaxHDHTu3MLW+tVjmNHBg8AfeZ46aXNkQv
 vVS1Ei1wX3g=
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:05:55 -0800
From: Philip Guenther <guenther+mtafilters@sendmail.com>
X-X-Sender: guenther@vanye.sendmail.com
To: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com>
cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
In-Reply-To: <f470f68e0901100952q8e5e0fex6b99e9c137ec4021@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSO.2.00.0901111754090.24319@vanye.sendmail.com>
References: <f470f68e0812041225x318bfdccg1bf9201b53ce8c2e@mail.gmail.com>
 <f470f68e0812140301r7ef04460t24f2ea9e6d2ff7a0@mail.gmail.com>
 <01N32VHWP1EK00SE3A@mauve.mrochek.com>
 <f470f68e0812141304i228b5a03s890e0f101b76b07e@mail.gmail.com> 
 <01N335CY3MAQ00SE3A@mauve.mrochek.com>
 <f470f68e0812150500r5d1916f4obbd941434295fe07@mail.gmail.com>
 <01N3MQQCAYL000007A@mauve.mrochek.com> <495889A0.40505@isode.com>
 <f470f68e0901061501m5f59723cu805e0487c548145@mail.gmail.com>
 <01N3ZJMB3Y6M00007A@mauve.mrochek.com>
 <f470f68e0901100952q8e5e0fex6b99e9c137ec4021@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSO 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MM-Ex-RefId: 149371::090111180558-11670B90-004A4D08/0-0/99-17
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>


On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...
> we're currently adding xml serialisation for jsieve over at apache. 
> there are number of concrete use cases that this serialisation needs to 
> satisfy.

This entire discussion might have been less painful if the concrete use 
cases the jsieve developers have had been brought up at the beginning.  
The discussion that has progressed has been almost completely abstract; 
the one time someone actually said "for example, such-and-such doesn't 
work" the subthread seemed to resolve itself almost directly.  As is, the 
"does it support namespaces" thread is completely confused in my mind 
because I have been unable to determine what you consider necessary and 
sufficient, Robert.

(Fortunately, I'm just a bystander on this doc, so I'm not sweating my 
failure here.)


Philip Guenther


