Re: [sieve] Sieve :fcc option

NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com Tue, 17 January 2017 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621AD129594 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:50:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFweOeuzCZOG for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [68.183.62.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874CF1279EB for <sieve@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:50:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01Q9S9O35GFK000E6T@mauve.mrochek.com> for sieve@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:47:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01Q9Q42VM1B400004H@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for sieve@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:47:14 -0800 (PST)
From: NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01Q9S9O1X09A00004H@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:42:37 -0800
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:31:38 -0500" <7357c8a0-4256-963c-3122-039053135f3b@andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <7357c8a0-4256-963c-3122-039053135f3b@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sieve/9d5M4x5ULLuP7vQE5OqibGTL0nE>
Cc: sieve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sieve] Sieve :fcc option
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sieve/>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:50:37 -0000

> A vendor that uses Cyrus IMAP has some customers that would like to have
> copies of outgoing Sieve-generated messages (e.g. reject, vacation)
> stored in their Sent mailbox.  We could obviously do this with a user
> configurable option, but I was thinking of extending Sieve to support a
> :fcc <mailbox> option on reject, vacation and any new actions where it
> might apply.  The option could also leverage
> draft-bosch-sieve-special-use to do something like :fcc "\\Sent"

I see no problem for notify or vacation, but there's a serious semantics issue
with reject - when you reject a message you are saying, "I didn't receive" this
message". If you implement an action where you do in fact receive the message,
albeit as a part of a DSN, you're essentially lying about what you did.

Accurate information about who actually received what is especially important
in environments with compliance archiving requirements. I don't look forward to
explaining how a reject ended up being a keep.

				Ned