Re: [sieve] Fwd: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

Aaron Stone <aaron@serendipity.cx> Tue, 21 May 2013 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron@serendipity.cx>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A181F0D3A for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.642
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.642 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvtDsba+g+Nh for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.serendipity.cx (slice.serendipity.cx [67.23.2.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99F61F0D27 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by slice.serendipity.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3026594012 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wp18so1426388obc.35 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hQ4LHLkQF5JC+zD3jZ56bPZyC4RVzIE6H2wJS3/gneU=; b=XLoGgR7Ae+aVluI2RLs7NHvL0ty6hRm46DDHHDuUcugU5jSJZlFcpTkxCNeJOH/P0h DSRBKs4K/B6TzG6kf8LQCqs4o0AgaZGa/ITgPVDMMNEeMeV2rYThhklHuoQK1ZIYVQ/E rKXXspUDzZiUJ2S8pGm7zowt15aBbl8diS0ygAjKk2X5vFwqqpL4SIFFbOPth2VaLHR4 iQTEvgyc0TVGRN9JL9jsOWRJIhfIZae+ujJy5NE8hZSCOexM4Dd0pbwmCM4Jt9z9iHpF Ld7LppagrPcPPSoCmFWFpJTKHe67WAWhJM1NcoxDxgzW9WP2qCm34z25fxwrWW2xwQtI CicA==
X-Received: by 10.60.40.4 with SMTP id t4mr2927285oek.133.1369174933661; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.55.97 with HTTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 15:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5B930670-A6D9-448F-8B44-5A8FA73321B6@isode.com>
References: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com> <5B930670-A6D9-448F-8B44-5A8FA73321B6@isode.com>
From: Aaron Stone <aaron@serendipity.cx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:21:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdAYKXutkqfu0gj9M3dsFar732XrByVWkB-2ZyS4HzRyfB6mA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cb9628e755b04dd41e1b7
Cc: "sieve@ietf.org" <sieve@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sieve] Fwd: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:22:49 -0000

I read the draft and it looked good to me. +1


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com>wrote;wrote:

> Hi,
> Are there people here who can do additional reviews of the draft?
>
> Thank you,
> Alexey
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
> *Date:* 7 May 2013 23:24:30 GMT+01:00
> *To:* IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* *[apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via
> APPSAWG*
>
> We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
> since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document and
> appears to fall within our charter.
>
> We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
> through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
> adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
> currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
> constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?
>
> Alternatively, the ADs may wish to spin up another short-lived WG to
> handle this.  Barry or Pete, care to comment?
>
> -MSK, co-chairin'
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sieve mailing list
> sieve@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
>
>