Re: [sieve] Sieve variables and editheader

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Sat, 14 January 2017 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDF8129C99 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:48:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-inHOTkavFX for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.105.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C03129C89 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.31.24.61] (VPN-172-31-24-61.VPN.CMU.LOCAL [172.31.24.61]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v0EHm5pu021073 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:48:06 -0500
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <d6b75ac6-7273-e4fb-d406-3bc92f33aaee@andrew.cmu.edu> <0F10022A-6EE1-4107-85B3-61E626899216@isode.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Message-ID: <e3a015e3-b420-4464-53cc-47fadde143e2@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:48:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0F10022A-6EE1-4107-85B3-61E626899216@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.3.0.2556906, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.1.14.173917
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 8% ( HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CC_NAME 0, __CC_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __CC_REAL_NAMES 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 8%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 128.2.105.204
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sieve/AqxC_U2sZHg6VHvt32yh10hhLxM>
Cc: Sieve mailing list <sieve@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sieve] Sieve variables and editheader
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sieve/>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:48:10 -0000

No reason against it, just asking.

Should a redirect action use the original headers or the edited? I'm 
assuming that reject and vacation use the original headers.


On 01/14/2017 09:23 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 13:18, Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I'm in the process of implementing editheader in Cyrus IMAP and I'm wondering if variables are/should be allowed in header field names and/or values.
> Yes, why not?
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexey

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University