IETF Logo Mail Archive

AD evaluation comments: draft-ietf-sieve-variables

"Scott Hollenbeck" <sah@428cobrajet.net> Thu, 18 August 2005 13:18 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7IDIiIQ012707; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j7IDIits012706; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.verisignlabs.com (cliffie.verisignlabs.com [65.201.175.9]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7IDIhpE012695 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sah@428cobrajet.net)
Received: from dul1shollenbl1 ([::ffff:216.168.239.87]) (AUTH: LOGIN shollenb, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by mail.verisignlabs.com with esmtp; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:18:43 -0400 id 005BC07C.43048AB3.00007683
From: Scott Hollenbeck <sah@428cobrajet.net>
To: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: AD evaluation comments: draft-ietf-sieve-variables
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:18:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Thread-index: AcWj91cX2+EVOMpTRcGztnALcBVYxg==
Message-ID: <courier.43048AB3.00007683@mail.verisignlabs.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Just a small nit and a question:

The Abstract should be more clear about the focus of the document.  It
describes "This extension", but it doesn't explain what's being extended.

RFC 2234 has been obsoleted.  Can the reference to 2234 be updated to refer
to 2234bis instead?

These are minor.  Please hold off on making any changes until IETF last call
comments can be addressed.

-Scott-

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status