Re: Default match types and for_every_part
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 11 July 2006 22:34 UTC
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6BMYjou032340; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:34:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k6BMYjH9032339; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:34:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from pat.uio.no (IDENT:7411@pat.uio.no [129.240.10.4]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6BMYi28032315 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:34:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from kjetilho@ifi.uio.no)
Received: from mail-mx5.uio.no ([129.240.10.46]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0QoS-0001gk-SZ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:34:40 +0200
Received: from mattugur.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.168]) by mail-mx5.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1G0QoQ-0006yg-Ja; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:34:38 +0200
Subject: Re: Default match types and for_every_part
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
To: Nigel Swinson <Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com>
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
In-Reply-To: <003401c66535$cf86ae20$6401a8c0@nigelhome>
References: <003401c66535$cf86ae20$6401a8c0@nigelhome>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:34:37 +0200
Message-Id: <1152657277.16652.117.camel@mattugur.ifi.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.881, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.12, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 12:21 +0100, Nigel Swinson wrote: > I think it should be foreverypart, not for_every_part. We already > have addheader, deleteheader, fileinto. We don't have add_header, > delete_header, file_into. I think so, too. actually, I think I prefer "foreachpart", since "each" is more commonly used in iteration context in other programming languages. -- Kjetil T.
- Default match types and for_every_part Nigel Swinson
- Re: Default match types and for_every_part Kjetil Torgrim Homme