Re: Minor issue in draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt

"Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com> Thu, 01 June 2006 20:33 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k51KXH0v002351; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:33:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k51KXHam002350; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:33:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mv.mv.com (osmium.mv.net [199.125.85.152]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k51KXFvj002323 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:33:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mem@mv.mv.com)
Received: (qmail 57808 invoked by uid 101); 1 Jun 2006 16:33:11 -0400
From: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:33:10 -0400
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: Minor issue in draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt
Message-ID: <20060601203310.GL68629@osmium.mv.net>
References: <1148767597.11000.7.camel@localhost> <01M312F9FQA40008CX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01M312F9FQA40008CX@mauve.mrochek.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:08:23AM -0700, Ned Freed wrote:
> 
> I just noticed that although the draft makes heavy use of the relational :value
> match type, it says nothing about how :count should be handled. I suggest
> adding a note to say that the "count value" is 1 if there's a spamtest or
> virustest result to check, 0 otherwise.

I like that... I could swear that had been suggested at some point but
can't find it, so probably not.

mm