IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt

Michael Haardt <michael@freenet-ag.de> Fri, 19 August 2005 11:00 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7JB0t0A060144; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:00:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j7JB0tis060143; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [194.97.50.155]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7JB0swA060129 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:00:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael@freenet-ag.de)
Received: from [194.97.50.135] (helo=mx2.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1E64cG-0004zK-GJ for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:00:52 +0200
Received: from nostromo.freenet-ag.de ([194.97.7.6]) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #3) id 1E64cG-0006OO-Dz for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:00:52 +0200
Received: from michael by nostromo.freenet-ag.de with local (ID michael) (Exim 4.52 #11) id 1E64cG-0000VE-4c for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:00:52 +0200
To: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt
Message-Id: <E1E64cG-0000VE-4c@nostromo.freenet-ag.de>
From: Michael Haardt <michael@freenet-ag.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:00:52 +0200
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

>  Any line MUST NOT exceed SMTP limit on the maximal line length. The 
> server MAY insert CRLFs to make the reason string conform to any such 
> limits.
>
> Does this address your issue?

I prefer an error upon violating the limit, not leaving it up to the
implementation to work around the violating by folding lines, but it
does address my issue.  Thanks!

Michael

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status