Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt

"Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com> Tue, 23 August 2005 19:02 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7NJ2xSL061954; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j7NJ2x66061953; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mv.mv.com (osmium.mv.net [199.125.85.152]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with SMTP id j7NJ2wZo061940 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:02:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mem@mv.mv.com)
Received: (qmail 89815 invoked by uid 101); 23 Aug 2005 15:02:57 -0400
From: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:02:57 -0400
To: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>, IETF MTA Filters List <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt
Message-ID: <20050823190257.GW26861@osmium.mv.net>
References: <FF47B65677F611C47F8FC103@ninevah.cyrusoft.com> <20050818190929.GM21465@osmium.mv.net> <4305B817.9070503@isode.com> <20050819174803.GB17079@osmium.mv.net> <430895AB.1090603@isode.com> <430A2A51.6080103@elvey.com> <20050823180817.GO26861@osmium.mv.net> <1124823417.19646.76.camel@chico.njus.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1124823417.19646.76.camel@chico.njus.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 14:08 -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:41:05PM -0700, Matthew Elvey wrote:
> > > How's this replacement?
> > > 
> > > (The first sentence is unchanged.)
> > > 
> > >   The "refuse" action refuses delivery of a message by sending back
> > > 
> > > the 550 SMTP response code to an SMTP client. This extension can be 
> > > supported only by a Sieve implementation capable of sending the 550 over 
> > > an SMTP connection between Administrative Units.
> > 
> > Well, I'm probably being anal (again).  To me, the use of "between
> > Administrative Units" and "over the open Internet" are birds of a
> > feather.
> 
> the current draft doesn't say "over the open Internet", so I don't see
> how this is relevant?

It's relevant because I thought the use of "administrative unit" was
a suggested replacement for "over the open internet" elsewhere in
this thread.  Did I misunderstand?

mm