Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt

Michael Haardt <michael@freenet-ag.de> Thu, 18 August 2005 14:11 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7IEBBDb031042; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j7IEBBZM031041; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7IEBAwv031031 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael@freenet-ag.de)
Received: from [194.97.55.192] (helo=mx8.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1E5l6r-00043B-89 for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:11:09 +0200
Received: from nostromo.freenet-ag.de ([194.97.7.6]) by mx8.freenet.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #3) id 1E5l6r-0000Iu-5g for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:11:09 +0200
Received: from michael by nostromo.freenet-ag.de with local (ID michael) (Exim 4.52 #11) id 1E5l6n-0008UN-Qy for ietf-mta-filters@imc.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:11:05 +0200
To: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-00.txt
Message-Id: <E1E5l6n-0008UN-Qy@nostromo.freenet-ag.de>
From: Michael Haardt <michael@freenet-ag.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:11:05 +0200
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> >Section 5.1:
> >
> >   If the "reason" string is multiline, than the reason text MUST be
> >   returned as a multiline SMTP/LMTP response, per [SMTP], section
> >   4.2.1.
> >
> >What should happen for plain old SMTP sessions?
> >  
> >
> I am not sure I understand the question.

I just read again and although there are clients using HELO and not
understanding multiline responses, RFC 821 already allowed multiline
responses under all circumstances.  So forget what I said.

Section 5.1 covers not allowed characters, but should add that it is
an error if messages generated from the response messages would
have lines exceeding 512 bytes in length.

Michael