IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: List of open issues with Sieve reject draft (draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-02.txt)

"Nigel Swinson" <Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com> Mon, 10 July 2006 11:05 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6AB54uV083800; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:05:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k6AB54nN083799; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:05:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.rockliffe.com (mail.rockliffe.com [147.208.128.10]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6AB53CE083770 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:05:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com)
X-Spam-Score-spf_status:
X-Spam-Score-Spamcatcher1: c59c94e253812e8ee7f119fceb10603c
X-Spam-Score-Summary: 40, 2.5, 0, a2cad9ab982d78ca, 00af4c7c0df4fab8, nigel.swinson@rockliffe.com, , RULES_HIT:355:379:481:539:540:541:542:543:559:567:599:601:945:973:988:989:1155:1156:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1487:1513:1515:1516:1518:1521:1534:1538:1587:1593:1594:1683:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2393:2553:2559:2562:3027:3352, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:
X-Spam-Score-rbl_summary: none
X-Spam-Score-Phishing_status: no
X-Spam-Score-Countries:
X-Spam-Score-Charsets: windows-1252
X-Spam-Score: 4
Received: from nigelhome (unverified [10.42.44.151]) by mail.rockliffe.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 7.0.3) with ESMTP id <B0003438986@mail.rockliffe.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:04:55 -0700
Message-ID: <002801c6a410$b03c6d60$0202fea9@nigelhome>
From: Nigel Swinson <Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
References: <44B1353C.7050002@isode.com>
Subject: Re: List of open issues with Sieve reject draft (draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-02.txt)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:04:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by balder-227.proper.com id k6AB53CE083792
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> 1). “SHOULD be incompatible with other actions” is too strong, for 
> example there are good reasons to do reject+fileinto.
> 
> I tend to agree that reject should be made compatible with other actions 
> (except for vacation), so I would like to at least downgrade SHOULD to MAY.

I agree, I deliberately ignored the SHOULD anyway

> 3). Arnt has requested to allow for reject+redirect to be treated as 
> just reject. I am not sure I like that. Opinions?
> 
> Comments?

I don't like that either, I can't see any reason why we'd want that.

Nigel

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status