Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt

Tim Showalter <tjs@psaux.com> Thu, 21 July 2005 17:00 UTC

Message-ID: <42DFD537.6070904@psaux.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:02:47 -0700
From: Tim Showalter <tjs@psaux.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Haardt <michael@freenet-ag.de>
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt
References: <E1DvWPE-0001o1-Ca@nostromo.freenet-ag.de>
In-Reply-To: <E1DvWPE-0001o1-Ca@nostromo.freenet-ag.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk

Michael Haardt wrote:
> Section 1.1:
> 
>    Each section on a command (test, action, or control) has a line
>    labeled "Syntax:".  This line describes the syntax of the command,
>    including its name and its arguments.
> 
> If this line described syntax, its contents would be listed in the
> grammar.  There is a number of RFCs that list specific rules throughout
> the document, explaining them, and all of them are listed together in
> the full grammar.  That's _not_ the case for Sieve.

You're right.  The word "Syntax" should be replaced by "Usage" or 
something.  I don't think "Semantics" is right, either.

Tim

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Internet-Drafts
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Michael Haardt
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Tim Showalter
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Ned Freed
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Michael Haardt
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Michael Haardt
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-04.txt Philip Guenther