Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3LBLqsG092810; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:21:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k3LBLq3W092809; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:21:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from mail.rockliffe.com (mail.rockliffe.com [147.208.128.10]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3LBLqbh092800 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:21:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com) X-Spam-Score: 1 Received: from nigelhome (unverified [10.42.40.204]) by mail.rockliffe.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 7.0.3) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:21:42 -0700 Message-ID: <003401c66535$cf86ae20$6401a8c0@nigelhome> From: "Nigel Swinson" To: Subject: Default match types and for_every_part Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:21:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0031_01C6653E.300E0240" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C6653E.300E0240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-06.txt In 2.7.1, buried in a long paragraph, it says "Commands default to using = ":is" matching if no match type argument is supplied". In 5.7 when = discussing the header test it explicitly says that the default match = type for the header test is "is", but in 5.1, and 5.4 when discussing = envelope and address tests there is no mention. I found this to be = inconsistent and initially assumed that the default match type for = address/envelope was unspecified. =20 I suggest we remove the reference to the default match type from section = 5.7, and split the "long" paragraph in 2.7.1 at the "Note" that = discusses interactions with comparators. While you are at it, you might want to correct the "supoprt" typo. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-body-03.txt I think it makes no sense for the default match type to be :is for the = body test, could it be :contains, and could say so in section 3? Or do = people think it is easier for the default match type to always be :is? http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-mime-loop-00.txt I think it should be foreverypart, not for_every_part. We already have = addheader, deleteheader, fileinto. We don't have add_header, = delete_header, file_into. Nigel ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C6653E.300E0240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-06.txt

In 2.7.1, buried in a long paragraph, it says "Commands = default to=20 using ":is" matching if no match type argument is supplied". In = 5.7 when=20 discussing the header test it explicitly says that the default match = type for=20 the header test is "is", but in 5.1, and 5.4 when discussing envelope = and=20 address tests there is no mention. I found this to be inconsistent = and=20 initially assumed that the default match type for address/envelope was=20 unspecified.

I suggest we remove the reference to the default match type from = section=20 5.7, and split the "long" paragraph in 2.7.1 at the "Note" that = discusses=20 interactions with comparators.

While you are at it, you might want to correct the "supoprt" = typo.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-body-03.txt

I think it makes no sense for the default match type to be :is for = the body=20 test, could it be :contains, and could say so in section 3? = Or do=20 people think it is easier for the default match type to always be = :is?

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-mime-loop-00.t= xt

I think it should be foreverypart, not for_every_part. We = already=20 have addheader, deleteheader, fileinto. We don't have add_header,=20 delete_header, file_into.

Nigel

------=_NextPart_000_0031_01C6653E.300E0240--