IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sieve] On "reject" and :fcc

NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com Wed, 18 January 2017 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4680C1293E0 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lJHgf4IvHYlz for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [68.183.62.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63931127076 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01Q9TLJXVOM8000UZL@mauve.mrochek.com> for sieve@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:38:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01Q9Q42VM1B400004H@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for sieve@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:38:14 -0800 (PST)
From: NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01Q9TLJTUF9E00004H@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:36:26 -0800
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:06:03 +0100" <012499BC3A68B6D107DF9613@tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de>
References: <1484691459.1802986.850940944.17135021@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SN4A5CB400004H@mauve.mrochek.com> <1484695748.520887.851011408.2EB11064@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SP1R5AP200004H@mauve.mrochek.com> <1484698881.2689745.851047760.743150E6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SPQ6F0W000004H@mauve.mrochek.com> <012499BC3A68B6D107DF9613@tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de>
To: Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sieve/wIGDTggKjm9jcmoCGEcvqYT_PdQ>
Cc: sieve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sieve] On "reject" and :fcc
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sieve/>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:42:58 -0000

> For the record, I agree with Bron on this. It's up to the users if they
> want to lie.

I have no problem with users lying to other users. I have a big problem with
them being able to trick the system into lying on their behalf.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email