Re: Minor issue in draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 02 June 2006 13:26 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k52DQYkF059449; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:26:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k52DQY6x059448; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:26:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k52DQWS2059442 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:26:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from alexey.melnikov@isode.com)
Received: from [172.16.1.99] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com via TCP (submission) with ESMTPA; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:26:29 +0100
Message-ID: <44803C49.7040202@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:25:29 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
CC: ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
Subject: Re: Minor issue in draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt
References: <1148767597.11000.7.camel@localhost> <01M312F9FQA40008CX@mauve.mrochek.com> <20060601203310.GL68629@osmium.mv.net> <01M343DLS0XS0049K2@mauve.mrochek.com> <67FEAFFBBCF827A070810CB4@ninevah.local>
In-Reply-To: <67FEAFFBBCF827A070810CB4@ninevah.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> Interesting - I can't ever recall that being discussed before, at 
> least in my presence :-). But it does provide an interesting solution 
> to the 'untested' case which is somewhat awkward with the :percent 
> option.
>
> So here is a proposal: remove the current "untested" return value and 
> instead require scripts to use :count to determine that case with the 
> behavior of :count being defined as Ned suggested.

This looks fine to me.

Just to clarify: "spamtest :value" would return 0 for both "untested" 
and "definitely non spam" case?