Return-Path: X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C511E817E for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BN-UMvM80QKo for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72F311E816F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24003122D8A3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:09:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYVgO5nhZLEg for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:09:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46C1C122D898 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:09:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:09:44 -0400 From: Cyrus Daboo To: SIEVE Message-ID: <750B7DFB79E79E5B1CCA18C5@caldav.corp.apple.com> In-Reply-To: <816FC375A4D2F1E3CCDEEAA2@caldav.corp.apple.com> References: <816FC375A4D2F1E3CCDEEAA2@caldav.corp.apple.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=651 Subject: [sieve] Update, was Re: SIEVE WG Status X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIEVE Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:09:53 -0000 Hi , After consultation with our AD, the current plan is to go ahead with the meeting in Quebec City next month. However, the level of activity/interest in on going work expressed at that meeting (and in the intervening time) will be used to determine whether we continue with a Working Group or shut it down in favor of individual submissions. Please submit updates to all drafts that you would like to see discussed in Quebec, and post a list of discussion items for those (so I can start to put together an agenda). Note we only have a 1 hour slot so we need to concentrate on key issues that need "face time" discussions. -- Cyrus Daboo